Preparing for an Administrative Separation Board Hearing: A Comprehensive Guide -

Facing an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) hearing can be intimidating. Your military career, benefits, and reputation are on the line, so it’s crucial to approach this process prepared and informed. An ASB (called a Board of Inquiry or BOI if you’re an officer) is an administrative hearing that determines whether you should be retained in the service or separated, and if separated, what type of discharge you receive. The good news is that with the right preparation – from gathering evidence to practicing your responses – you can maximize your chances of a favorable outcome. This guide will walk you through step-by-step how to get ready, what to expect, and how to put your best foot forward at an ASB hearing. We’ll also clear up some common misconceptions and highlight the important rights and regulations you should know. Let’s get started.

Step-by-Step Preparation Checklist for Your Hearing

Preparing for an ASB hearing requires organization and proactive effort. Use this checklist as a starting point to ensure you cover all the bases well before your hearing date:

Understand Your Rights and Notification: When you’re notified of a recommended separation, carefully read the notification letter. It will state the reasons, the least favorable discharge they’re seeking, and your rights (like the right to consult counsel and to a board if eligible). Always elect to use your rights – do not waive your right to a board or to counsel without consulting a lawyer. If you’re not entitled to a board hearing (e.g. too few years of service and no Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge at stake), you still have the right to submit a written response or request a higher review.
Consult with an Attorney: Contact a military defense attorney as soon as possible. They will help you formulate a defense strategy, ensure procedures are followed, and prevent you from inadvertently waiving important rights. A good attorney can also help you understand the specific regulations for your branch (e.g. Army Regulation 635-200 for enlisted separations, or DoD Instruction 1332.14 which governs separation procedures).
Gather All Relevant Documents: Begin collecting any evidence that could support your case or mitigate the circumstances. This includes performance evaluations (NCOERs/OERs or fitness reports), awards and commendations, training certificates, prior counseling statements, medical records (if health or stress issues contributed to the situation), and any official reports related to the case (police reports, investigation results, lab test results for drug/alcohol cases, etc.). Remember, ASB hearings are not bound by formal court rules of evidence, so you can submit a wide range of documents – even letters, emails, social media printouts, and other records that would be “hearsay” in court. Organize these in a binder or digital folder by category for easy reference.
Line Up Witnesses and Statements: Identify people who can testify on your behalf or provide written statements. Consider character witnesses (like supervisors, peers, subordinates, or community members who can vouch for your duty performance, integrity, and value to the unit) and fact witnesses (people who have direct knowledge of the events or allegations in question). Reach out to them early to ask for their support. For those willing to testify in person or by phone, coordinate with your attorney to have them available at the hearing. If someone cannot attend, ask for a written sworn statement or letter. Even an email or memo from a witness can be submitted to the board if it’s relevant – the relaxed evidence rules allow it. Make sure to prepare your witnesses by briefing them on the process and what topics they might be asked about. Encourage them to be honest, concise, and factual.
Prepare Your Personal Statement: Decide whether you will make a statement to the board, and if so, how. You generally have three options: remain silent, make a sworn statement (testify under oath), or give an unsworn statement. In any case, plan what you want to convey. Many service members choose to make an unsworn statement because it allows you to tell your side of the story or express remorse and context without being cross-examined. We’ll discuss the pros and cons of each option later, but now is the time to start drafting what you’d say. If you testify under oath, work with your lawyer on a thorough Q&A prep (they will question you in a direct examination to present your story). If you go unsworn, you can write a statement to read or have it in a Q&A format with your attorney – either way, rehearse it multiple times.
Review the Government’s Evidence: You and your attorney have the right to see the evidence the command will present. Ensure you obtain the “discovery” or packet of evidence well before the hearing. Go through it carefully to spot inconsistencies or weak points. This might include things like counseling statements about incidents, positive urinalysis lab results, Article 15 or NJP records, MP reports, etc. Understanding what’s in the packet helps you prepare rebuttals for each item. If anything is missing (for example, if an investigative report is referenced but not included), your attorney can request it.
Develop Your Defense Strategy: With your attorney, decide on the approach to contest the separation. Generally, there are three possible strategies (which can be combined as needed): (a) Denial/No Basis – argue that you did not commit the alleged misconduct or that the evidence is insufficient to prove it. This often involves attacking the credibility of the evidence or witnesses and presenting exculpatory evidence of your own; (b) Mitigate/Minimize – acknowledge some incident occurred but show that it was relatively minor, an isolated lapse, or did not impact your overall service. Emphasize your good service record and that you have learned from the incident, making the case that it doesn’t warrant ending your career; (c) Accept and Show Rehabilitation – take responsibility for any mistakes but provide context and mitigating circumstances (e.g. personal stress, medical issues, lack of proper training or supervision) and evidence that you have addressed the issue (completed counseling, improved performance, etc.). In this approach, you are effectively asking the board to recognize that you can still be a valuable asset if retained, or at least to grant a higher discharge characterization due to your honorable service aside from this incident. Choose the path that best fits the facts of your case and what the evidence supports. Your attorney will help tailor the defense accordingly.
Practice Q&A and Board Etiquette: Spend time practicing for the hearing itself. If you will speak or testify, do mock questioning with your lawyer or a friend. Practice answering potential tough questions calmly and clearly. Also rehearse an opening statement if you plan to make one (often your counsel will handle opening/closing, but you may have input). Board etiquette is important: you’ll typically wear your service dress uniform and address the board members (who usually out-rank you) respectfully as “sir/ma’am” or by rank. Practice a confident posture and tone, even if you’re nervous. The more you rehearse, the more composed you will feel on the actual day.
Prepare Logistics and Final Details: As the hearing approaches, get your logistics in order. Ensure your witnesses know when and where to show up or have call-in info if telephonic. Make enough copies of your evidence binder for the board and the recorder (government’s attorney) – often three board members plus one for the recorder and one for yourself/your counsel. Check if the venue requires any clearance or if there are COVID/health protocols if applicable. Get your uniform ready (clean and properly adorned). Plan to arrive early on the day of the board to meet with your lawyer and get settled.
Mental and Emotional Preparation: Finally, take care of yourself in the lead-up to the hearing. It’s normal to feel stress, anxiety, or even anger about the situation – but you’ll need to present yourself as calm and professional. Find healthy ways to manage stress: exercise, adequate sleep, talking things out with a trusted friend, or using base resources like a chaplain or counselor. Remind yourself that no matter what happens, you will get through this. Going in with a positive, determined mindset will help you stay focused and composed.

This checklist covers the essentials, but every case is unique. Work closely with your attorney on any additional prep specific to your circumstances. Next, let’s dive deeper into some of these areas, starting with evidence.

Gathering and Organizing Strong Evidence

Building a solid evidence packet is one of the most important parts of your preparation. The board will make its decision based on the evidence and testimonies presented, so you want to put forth as much favorable information as possible to counter the allegations.

Collect Documents That Show Your Good Service: Pull together your past evaluation reports (NCOERs/OERs for Army, Fitreps for Navy/USMC, EPRs/OPRs for Air Force, etc.), as these often highlight your performance and character over time. Consistently positive evaluations or commendations can strongly support the argument that you are worth retaining. Include any awards, medals, or letters of commendation you’ve received. These highlight your achievements and contributions. For example, a letter from a commander praising you for a job well done or a certificate of achievement can counterbalance a misconduct incident by showing your value to the unit.
Include Relevant Incident-Specific Evidence: If the separation is due to a specific incident, gather evidence surrounding that event. For instance, for a positive urinalysis (drug test), obtain the lab report and chain-of-custody documents to see if there were any procedural errors. For an alleged misconduct like DUI or an off-base incident, get the police report, MP report, or CID report. If there are witness statements from an investigation (e.g. an AR 15-6 investigation in the Army), make sure you have those – they might contain exonerating info or inconsistencies you can exploit. Any physical evidence or records (photos, text message logs, emails) that shed light on the incident should be preserved and reviewed for use.
Gather Mitigation Evidence: Mitigating evidence helps explain the circumstances or show that the context reduces the severity of the issue. For example, if you had a medical or family issue at the time of the misconduct, consider including documentation. A letter from a doctor or therapist about your condition (say, you were dealing with PTSD, depression, or a family crisis) can help the board understand why something may have occurred and that you’ve been addressing the issue. If you’ve taken positive steps since the incident (completed a rehab program, attended anger management, etc.), include certificates or letters from counselors about your progress.
Character Reference Letters: Reach out to colleagues, former supervisors, community leaders, or anyone who can speak to your character, work ethic, and integrity. Ask them to write character reference letters on your behalf. These letters should ideally state the writer’s relationship to you, how long they’ve known you, and positive attributes or specific anecdotes of your good conduct and contributions. While live witness testimony is stronger, written letters are still valuable – and boards can consider them even if the author isn’t present. A stack of sincere, positive letters can leave a strong impression on the board members that you have the support of others and are not defined by the one incident.
Organize and Label Everything: Presentation matters. Organize your evidence in a logical way – typically, the government’s packet will be organized (and usually indexed or tabbed). You should do the same with your materials. Common categories include: personal data (enlistment record, training certificates), performance docs (evals, awards), incident-related docs (investigation reports, etc.), medical/mitigation docs, and character letters. Make a cover sheet or index for your submission binder. This not only helps you and the board find things quickly during the hearing, but it also signals to the board that you took the process seriously and have your act together.
Quality Over Quantity (But More is Good Too): There’s really no strict limit on how much evidence you can submit. Since the board can consider almost anything relevant, err on the side of including it if you think it helps. That said, focus on impactful evidence. Ten solid character letters are better than thirty lukewarm ones. A couple of outstanding NCOERs with senior endorsements might carry more weight than a pile of basic training certificates. Always ask yourself: “What does this piece of evidence prove or show in my favor?” If the answer is clear and positive, include it. If it’s marginal, you can include it but don’t rely on it heavily. And if something might accidentally harm your case (for example, a mediocre eval that brings up another issue), discuss with your attorney whether to omit it – the government will likely submit any negative records they have anyway, so your focus is on the positives and explanations.
Be Prepared to Explain Your Evidence: Simply submitting evidence isn’t enough; you or your counsel should be ready to highlight and explain the key points of each important document during the hearing. For instance, if you have a glowing evaluation, your attorney might, in argument or through witness testimony, emphasize “Sergeant XYZ’s platoon leader rated him as the #1 NCO in the unit that year, noting his exceptional leadership during deployment.” Don’t assume the board will read every word – you need to point out the gold nuggets in your records. So, as you compile evidence, note the parts you want to stress.

By thoroughly gathering and organizing evidence, you help ensure the board sees a complete picture of you – not just the negative parts that the command might focus on. Strong evidence is the foundation of a strong defense.

Selecting and Preparing Your Witnesses

Witnesses can play a crucial role in your defense at a separation board. A live person testifying on your behalf can often sway hearts and minds more than a document can. Here’s how to approach choosing and prepping witnesses:

Pick the Right People: Focus on individuals who have direct knowledge or insight that will help your case. Great witness choices include: Character witnesses who can attest to your good military character, work performance, and potential for continued service (examples: a current or former supervisor, a platoon sergeant, an officer in your chain who supports you, a trusted peer, or even a subordinate who can speak to your leadership). Also consider leaders from outside your chain like a chaplain, a senior NCO you worked with, or a civilian mentor if relevant. Additionally, fact witnesses can be critical if the facts of the case are in dispute – for example, a fellow service member who saw what happened and can clarify the story, or an expert who can interpret technical evidence (perhaps a toxicologist if you’re fighting a drug test result). Choose witnesses who are credible and, if possible, calm under pressure. A witness with high rank or many years of service (a Master Sergeant, a Chief, etc.) can carry a lot of weight, but sincerity and relevant knowledge matter more than rank alone.
In-Person vs. Remote vs. Written: In a perfect world, all your witnesses would appear in person at the board. In-person testimony is typically the most persuasive – the board can see the person’s demeanor and sincerity. However, practical constraints (distance, deployment, scheduling) sometimes make that hard. Many boards will allow telephonic testimony or video teleconference if a witness can’t be there physically. If a witness is truly unable to speak live, a written statement (sworn affidavit or unsworn letter) is better than nothing. For telephonic witnesses, ensure the board recorder or legal advisor knows ahead of time to set up a phone line or Zoom and that the witness will be available at the appointed time. For written statements, have your attorney submit them as part of your evidence packet (ideally as sworn affidavits, which generally carry a bit more weight than unsworn letters).
Prepare Your Witnesses: Once someone agrees to help, take time to prepare them. Share with them the basics of the board process and the key points you hope they will convey. Practice a short Q&A with them if possible: go over the questions your attorney will likely ask to bring out their testimony. For example, a character witness might be asked, “How do you know the Respondent and for how long?” “Can you describe their work performance or character?” “Would you serve with them again or recommend retention, and why?” Make sure the witness is comfortable speaking truthfully – no one should lie or exaggerate, as that can backfire. Also, warn them that the government’s attorney (called the Recorder) or the board members might have some questions for them too. They should be prepared to answer those calmly. Your attorney can also prep them on any likely cross-examination points. The goal is that nothing the government asks catches them completely off guard.
Emphasize Professionalism: Remind your witnesses to dress appropriately if they are coming in person (uniform for military personnel is typically expected; business attire for civilians). If by video, they should still dress professionally and ensure a quiet environment. They should address the board respectfully, just like you will. Sometimes witnesses (especially peers or friends) might be tempted to be very informal – caution them to be respectful in language and tone.
Quality of Testimony: A witness should stick to what they personally know. For example, a supervisor can speak about your work ethic and any improvements they’ve seen since the incident, but if they weren’t there for the incident, they shouldn’t speculate on it (“I heard from others that it was just a misunderstanding…” – hearsay like that, while admissible, is not very credible). It’s okay if not every witness knows about the misconduct; character witnesses are there to talk about you generally. Fact witnesses should stick to facts (“I was there that night; SGT X didn’t raise his voice or get violent as claimed”). Character witnesses can offer opinions like “I trust him with my life” or “I believe this was out of character and he deserves a second chance,” which can be powerful if genuine.
Number of Witnesses: There’s no set rule, but be mindful of the board’s time and patience. A few strong witnesses are better than a parade of 15 people saying similar things. Discuss with your attorney how many witnesses to call. Often, having 2-3 really good character witnesses and any necessary fact witnesses is sufficient. If you have more willing folks, you can always submit their letters so their support is noted without lengthening the hearing too much.
Witnesses the Government May Call: Be aware the command might have their own witnesses, such as the commander who initiated the separation, a supervisor who will speak to the incidents, or investigators. Your attorney will get a list of the government’s witnesses beforehand. You should discuss anything concerning about them (for example, if one has a grudge or history of issues with you, that could be used to impeach their credibility). Being prepared for who the government will call is as important as prepping your own witnesses, because you or your attorney will get to cross-examine them.

Bringing in well-prepared witnesses can humanize you to the board and provide perspectives that documents alone cannot. It shows that people are willing to stand up for you – which inherently sends a message about your worth to the unit. Now, let’s talk about handling the questions and stress during the hearing itself.

Testifying and Handling Questions (Direct and Cross-Examination)

One of the most nerve-wracking parts of an ASB hearing is answering questions – whether you’re being questioned by your own attorney (direct examination), by the government’s representative (cross-examination), or even by the board members. Here’s how to stay composed and respond effectively:

Understand the Questioning Process: After opening statements, the government will present its witnesses and evidence, then your side will present yours. If you testify (either sworn or unsworn), it typically happens during your case. In a sworn testimony scenario, your attorney will first ask you questions (direct exam) to let you explain your side of events, provide context, and highlight positive points. Then the Recorder (government lawyer) gets to cross-examine you, and the board members can also ask you questions. Cross-examination can be challenging – the Recorder may ask leading questions, try to poke holes in your story, or get you to admit unfavorable facts. If you choose an unsworn statement, the process is different: you might speak freely or have your attorney prompt you with open-ended questions, and when you’re done, no one can cross-examine you or question you. You effectively step down after saying your piece. Understanding this difference is key to deciding which route to take (more on that in the next section). Even if you don’t personally testify, your witnesses will face direct exam from the side that called them and cross-exam from the other side, so these tips apply to them as well.
Staying Composed Under Cross-Examination: The best way to keep your cool under questioning is preparation and mindfulness. Before the hearing, brainstorm with your lawyer what tough questions might come up. Practice answering them. During the hearing, listen carefully to each question being asked – pause a second to really hear it before you respond. If you don’t understand a question, it’s perfectly fine to say, “Sir/Ma’am, could you please rephrase the question?” or “I’m not sure I understand; would you clarify?” This is much better than guessing and giving an answer that misses the mark. When you do answer, keep your answers clear and concise. Answer only the question asked, without volunteering extra information that wasn’t requested. For example, if asked “Did you go to the meeting late that day?”, a simple answer might be, “Yes, I arrived about 10 minutes late.” You don’t need to immediately launch into a full explanation unless it’s a question that calls for it. Your attorney can give you a chance on re-direct to explain any answers that came off poorly or need context.
Don’t Take the Bait – Stay Respectful: Sometimes, a cross-exam question might feel hostile or accusatory. The Recorder might say, “Isn’t it true that you were written up multiple times and just failed to improve?” It’s natural to feel defensive, but do not get into an argument. Stay calm and answer factually: e.g. “I received two counseling statements. After those, I worked with my squad leader and my performance improved, which is noted in my last evaluation.” By keeping your tone measured, you come across as a professional. If you get angry or sarcastic, the board will notice – and it won’t help your case. Also, always refer to the board members and counsel as “Sir/Ma’am” or by rank, even if the questioning is tough. Maintaining military bearing under pressure reflects well on you.
Tell the Truth: This hopefully goes without saying, but always be truthful in your testimony. Lying to an administrative board is not only unethical, it can be a separate UCMJ offense. Plus, inconsistent or false statements will destroy your credibility with the board. If you don’t remember something exactly, it’s okay to say “I don’t recall.” If you did something wrong and you’re doing the “accept responsibility” strategy, then acknowledge it but emphasize what you learned or how you’ve changed. Honesty, coupled with accountability, can sometimes impress the board more than a shaky denial.
Manage Your Nerves: It’s natural to be nervous while being questioned – even seasoned public speakers feel the heat when they’re the subject of scrutiny. A few techniques can help: Take a slow breath before answering each question to give yourself a moment to gather your thoughts. If your mouth is dry, ask for a sip of water. Remember to speak a bit slower than you normally would – people tend to rush when anxious. Also, if you find your heart racing, remind yourself that you prepared for this. Look at the person asking the question when answering (but you can occasionally glance at the board members too to “connect” with them as you speak).
Handling Board Members’ Questions: After the parties question a witness, board members often get a chance to ask their own questions. These can sometimes be the hardest to prep for because they come from the members’ own concerns or curiosity. Treat their questions with the same respect and composure. Often, board members ask something because they genuinely want clarification on a point. Try to directly answer what they ask. If they pose a “why” question (e.g. “Why should we believe you will not repeat this mistake if we retain you?”), this is your chance to earnestly assure them: e.g. “I take full responsibility and I’ve taken steps to address the issue, such as… I love the Army and I’ve learned a hard lesson. I won’t let this happen again.” These answers, delivered sincerely, can stick in their minds during deliberation.
Your Attorney Has Your Back: Remember, this is not a criminal trial with strict rules – your attorney can object to truly improper questions, but generally objections are rare in boards. However, if something really unfair or irrelevant is asked, trust your counsel to step in or advise you. Also, after cross-exam, your attorney might do a re-direct exam to clarify any confusion from your answers. For example, if on cross you had to answer a simple “Yes” that sounded bad, on re-direct your lawyer can ask, “Could you explain the circumstances around that event?” to let you give context. So even if cross gets rough, you’ll usually have a chance to smooth it out. Follow your lawyer’s guidance – they’re your corner man/woman in this fight.

By anticipating the questions and practicing your responses, you’ll feel more in control during the hearing. Staying calm and respectful under questioning not only helps get your points across clearly, it also shows the board that you have the maturity and composure expected of a service member.

Know Your Rights: Written Responses, Mitigation in Writing, and Never Waive Your Hearing

It’s crucial to understand your rights in the administrative separation process – both so you can assert them and so you don’t accidentally give them up. Equally important is knowing how to make your case in writing if a full board hearing isn’t authorized in your situation. Let’s break down a few key points:

If You’re Not Offered a Hearing, Respond in Writing: Not every service member is entitled to an in-person board hearing. For example, if you have less than 6 years of service and the command is not seeking an Other Than Honorable discharge, your separation may be processed via “notification procedure” (essentially paper-based). If you fall into this category, always submit a written response to the separation notice. This written statement is your only chance to tell your side of the story and present mitigating factors to the separation authority. Treat it like you would your case at a board: attach supporting documents (character letters, certificates, etc.), explain any extenuating circumstances, and argue for retention or at least an Honorable discharge. Even though you won’t appear before a board, the decision-maker will review what you submit. It’s your voice in the process, so never skip this step or reply with “no statement.”
Never Waive Your Right to a Board Without Counsel’s Advice: If you do have the right to an ASB hearing (commonly if you have 6+ years of service or the command recommends an OTH discharge), the notification will ask if you elect or waive your board. It is rarely wise to waive (turn down) your board. Sometimes commands might pressure members to waive the board, possibly implying that things will go easier or faster if you do. Do not sign away your board without speaking to a lawyer. Waiving the board usually means you’re accepting separation and giving up the chance to fight for retention. Unless there is a strategic reason (in some cases, as part of a deal to get a certain discharge characterization, etc.), you want that opportunity to present your case. As a general rule: elect the board hearing. It is always advisable to elect your rights and consult with counsel before waiving any of your rights or the board itself. In short, hold on to your rights – you have them for a reason.
Address Mitigating Circumstances Clearly: Whether in a written response or at a board, don’t assume decision-makers know the backstory or will automatically consider what’s not put in front of them. If there were mitigating factors – for example, you had an undiagnosed medical condition, or severe family issues, or you were given contradictory orders – spell that out in your statement or testimony. Provide any proof you have (doctor’s letters, etc.). The board or separation authority can only weigh these factors if you bring them up. Also, explicitly state your desire to continue serving, if that’s the case, and why you believe you can still be an asset to the military. If retention is not granted, you can alternatively plead for the best possible discharge characterization, explaining how a less favorable discharge would unfairly impact you given your otherwise honorable service.
Common Misconception – “Reenlistment is Always Possible Later”: A dangerous myth that sometimes circulates is commanders or NCOs saying “Just accept this discharge now, you can always reenlist later once things cool down.” Don’t be misled. In reality, an adverse discharge often ends your military career for good. For example, a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge disqualifies you from reenlisting in most caseslawforveterans.org. And an Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge will outright bar you from reenlistment in any branch.The reenlistment codes on your DD-214 (often RE-3 for General, RE-4 for OTH) will require major waivers or be non-waiverable. It is not as simple as “you can come back later.” So, do not lightly give up your chance to fight for retention by believing you can just rejoin; you very likely won’t be able to. Your best shot to continue your service is now, through this board process.
Don’t Miss Submission Deadlines: When notified of separation, there are usually tight deadlines to elect a board and to submit matters. If you’re told you can submit a rebuttal or matters for consideration, pay attention to how many days you have (often 2-7 days to respond to the initial notice in writing, and if a board, you’ll get a date for the board later). Failing to respond in time could be taken as waiving your rights or not contesting the separation. If you need more time (say you’re gathering documents), ask your attorney about requesting an extension. Always respond in writing in some form – even if it’s just to say “I request to appear before a board and will submit additional matters.”
If You Waived or Lost Board, All is Not Lost: In case you did waive your board (perhaps before you got legal advice) or were never entitled to one, remember you may have post-separation options like an appeal to a Discharge Review Board or Board for Correction of Military Records. Those are beyond the scope of this article, but keep in mind that a bad outcome can sometimes be fought later. Of course, it’s best to use every opportunity to avoid a bad outcome in the first place, which circles back to asserting your rights early and often.

Knowing and exercising your rights ensures the process is as fair as possible. Always engage with the separation process – either through a board hearing or through a strong written response – so that your side of the story and all favorable evidence are on the record.

Common Misconceptions About Administrative Separation Boards

There’s a lot of misinformation that floats around when someone is facing an ASB. Let’s clear up a few common misconceptions so you don’t fall into these traps:

“It’s Not a Big Deal, You Can Reenlist Later” – Wrong: As discussed above, this is flat-out false in most cases. An administrative discharge (especially General or OTH) can effectively end your ability to serve in the futurelawforveterans.orglawforveterans.org. Don’t let anyone downplay the significance of the board. If you want to continue your military career, you need to treat the ASB like a make-or-break event – because it often is.
“If the Board Recommends Separation, I Can Still Stay In” – Usually Wrong: Generally, if the board votes to separate you, the separation authority (a senior officer who reviews the board) will almost always go through with the discharge. The board’s recommendation is very influential. There are rare cases where a separation authority might disagree (for example, upgrading the discharge characterization favorably, or perhaps retaining someone despite the board’s recommendation, but that’s uncommon). So don’t bank on a higher-up saving you if the board votes against you. The flip side is also true: if the board members find no basis (meaning they do not substantiate the misconduct or they recommend retention), that essentially should halt the separation – you stay in service. Separation authorities cannot usually discharge you if the board said retain (except maybe in officer cases there are exceptions, but for enlisted, a board finding of no basis/retain means you’re retained). Therefore, the board’s decision is likely going to be final in effect, which is why your effort should go into convincing those board members.
“I Don’t Need a Lawyer; It’s Not a Court” – Very Misguided: While an ASB is not a criminal trial, it is a legal proceeding with significant consequences. You might have the right to free military counsel (and definitely the right to hire a civilian lawyer at your own expense). Not using a lawyer is like going into a complex land navigation course without a map – you might stumble through, but chances of getting lost (or in this case, lost in the procedure or missing something critical) are high. A lawyer experienced in military separations will know how to introduce evidence properly, how to question witnesses effectively, and how to make persuasive arguments on your behalf. They also ensure the command follows the regs and doesn’t violate your rights. Yes, it’s “just” an admin board – but the impact on your life is huge. Without proper representation, service members may inadvertently waive important rights, fail to introduce critical evidence, or be unprepared to counter the government’s case. In short: get a lawyer; you need an expert guide and advocate in this process.
“The Board Will Be Just Rubber-Stamp What Command Wants” – Not Necessarily: Some people think the board is just a formality and that if your commander wants you gone, you’re doomed. It’s true the command (through the Recorder) will be arguing for your separation, and board members are fellow officers/senior enlisted who understand the importance of good order and discipline. However, boards do not always rubber-stamp the command’s recommendation. Board members take their duty seriously to give you a fair hearing – they know the decision affects a fellow service member’s career and life. If you present a strong case, boards can and do vote to retain service members, even when the command pushed for separation. Statistics vary, but a meaningful percentage of boards result in retention or a recommendation for an Honorable discharge. So, don’t write yourself off – make your case vigorously. You have a fighting chance, especially if the evidence of misconduct is not clear-cut or if your positives significantly outweigh the negatives.
“I Should Just Say I’m Sorry and Plead for Mercy, That’s All” – Not Always: While expressing remorse and taking responsibility (when appropriate) is important, don’t confuse an ASB with a sentencing hearing. The board first must decide whether you actually did what you’re accused of. If you didn’t or the evidence is weak, simply apologizing without challenging the facts might be counterproductive – it’s like conceding the allegation. On the other hand, if the evidence is strong and you did mess up, then yes, owning it and showing how you’ve rehabilitated is the smarter move. Ideally, you balance both: contest what you can (make them prove their case with evidence, point out any exaggerations or errors in the allegations) and present mitigating factors (your good record, etc.). The board needs a reason to retain you – give them a factual/legal reason (e.g. “the case against me isn’t as strong as they say”) or an emotional/character reason (e.g. “I stumbled, but I’ve learned and here’s all the good I’ve done and will continue to do”). A one-dimensional “Please, I’m sorry, give me another chance” approach might come off as if you aren’t contesting an unjust allegation or you haven’t provided enough justification to outweigh the misconduct. Work with your counsel to strike the right balance for your scenario.
“The Board is Like a Criminal Court, I’m Protected the Same Way” – Incorrect: An administrative board is administrative, not criminal. Some legal protections differ. For instance, the burden of proof on the government is preponderance of the evidence (just over 50% certainty), not “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This lower standard means it’s easier for them to prove the alleged misconduct happened than in a court-martial. Also, rules of evidence are relaxed – hearsay can be allowed, and the board can consider things that a court might exclude. However, you do still have rights (as we’ve covered: remain silent, counsel, call witnesses, etc.). Just be aware that the vibe will be more informal than a court (often in a conference room) and the board can hear a wide range of information. Don’t expect a Perry Mason moment where a slick objection gets something tossed out – focus instead on countering the substance of any damaging evidence with your own evidence or explanation.

By dispelling these misconceptions, you can approach your board with a clear and realistic understanding. Now let’s outline what exactly will happen at the hearing, step by step.

How the Administrative Separation Board Hearing is Conducted

Knowing the flow of the hearing in advance will make you far more comfortable when the day comes. While procedures can vary slightly by service, an ASB typically follows a structure like this:

Preliminary Matters: The board members are identified (usually three members who outrank you). There may be introductions and the legal advisor or president of the board will read instructions. You and your counsel will be present, as well as the Recorder (government counsel). If you have any objections to the composition of the board (like a member who you believe cannot be impartial), your attorney can raise it here (this is the “challenge for cause” process). It’s not common to remove a board member, but the option exists if, say, you personally had conflict with one of them before. Administrative issues, such as admitting the letter of notification and your response into the record, also happen at the start.
Opening Statements: Both sides have the opportunity to make an opening statement. The Recorder will go first, giving an overview of the case and why they believe you should be separated. Then your defense counsel (or you, if you don’t have one, but it’s usually counsel) will make an opening on your behalf. This is a chance to basically say, “The evidence will show XYZ, and we believe the board should retain [you] in service (or grant an honorable discharge, etc.).” It’s like a roadmap of your case. The openings are not evidence, just arguments to frame the evidence. A good opening from your side will already plant the seed in the board’s mind that there is more to the story and reasons to doubt or mitigate the allegations.
Government’s Case-in-Chief: The command (government) presents its case first. This involves introducing evidence and calling witnesses to support the reasons for separation. For example, they might enter into evidence your counseling statements, NJP record, or a positive drug test result, and call witnesses such as your commander (to testify about why they lost confidence in you) or an MP who investigated an incident. Each document they offer can be objected to by your counsel if there’s a good reason (though remember, almost everything is usually allowed in). Each witness they call will be sworn in and questioned by the Recorder. After the Recorder finishes each witness, your attorney gets to cross-examine them. This is where inconsistencies can be exposed or the witness’s knowledge can be tested. For instance, if a platoon leader testifies you were a subpar soldier, your attorney might cross-exam with, “Isn’t it true he won Soldier of the Month last year under your command?” etc., to bring out favorable info. The board members might also ask the witness questions of their own after both sides finish.
Defense’s Case: Once the government rests (finishes presenting their evidence), it’s your turn. Your counsel can motion for a finding of “no basis” at this point if the government’s case was obviously insufficient (not common, but if, say, they literally showed no evidence of misconduct, your counsel could argue to end it there). Assuming the case proceeds, your side presents evidence and calls witnesses on your behalf. This is where your preparation pays off. Your character witnesses will testify, your fact witnesses will tell their stories, and any documents you want considered will be introduced (often as a defense exhibit packet). If you choose to testify sworn, you will be called as a witness and your attorney will do a direct examination, then you’ll face cross-exam and questions from the board. If you choose to make an unsworn statement, this is usually done after all other defense witnesses. An unsworn can be delivered sitting or standing, and can even be done from the defense table. It can be oral or written (if written, you’d normally read it or have it read). Again, unsworn means no one can question you after – you say your piece and that’s it. Often, defense counsel will introduce the unsworn by saying, “At this time, the Respondent has an unsworn statement.” You might then speak directly to the board members, explaining whatever you want – remorse, dedication, context, etc. Sometimes unsworn statements include Q&A with your attorney to guide the narrative, especially if you want to cover certain topics systematically. The board will listen, and while they might itch to ask you things, they are not allowed to since it’s unsworn. After your statement, you’re effectively done presenting your side.
Rebuttal Evidence (if any): In some cases, the government might request to present rebuttal evidence, but that’s only if you brought something new and unexpected in your defense that they feel they need to counter. For example, if you testified to a completely new alibi that they didn’t know about, they might try to bring in a quick witness to rebut. Rebuttal is usually brief and only to address specific points, not to re-hash their whole case. Your attorney can also cross-examine any rebuttal witness.
Closing Arguments: Both sides get to make a closing argument (sometimes called “closing statement”). The Recorder goes first again, summarizing the evidence and stating why the board should vote for separation (and perhaps arguing what characterization you deserve). Then your counsel will make a passionate argument for why you should be retained (or at least not given a harsh discharge). This is where all the threads come together – expect your attorney to highlight the lack of proof of misconduct (if you’re arguing that), all your good evidence and witness testimony, and reasons the board should give you another chance. They might also directly address the board members’ duty: for example, “The board’s task is to decide if SFC Doe’s 18 years of dedicated service and one mistake warrant ending his career. We submit that the evidence does not justify separation and that retaining him is in the best interest of the Army.” Your counsel may also touch on how a particular discharge characterization could affect you and that you’ve earned something better. It’s essentially the final pitch.
Board Deliberation: After closings, the board president will announce that the board will close for deliberation. You (the Respondent), your counsel, and the Recorder will be excused from the room. The board members will discuss privately. They have to answer three key questions (by vote): (1) Did you commit the misconduct or are the grounds for separation substantiated? (2) If yes, should you be separated or retained? (3) If separated, what should the characterization of service be – Honorable, General, or Other Than Honorable? The board may also recommend details like whether you get a suspension of separation (basically probation, if regulations allow) or not, but typically it’s just those three outcomes. The voting is usually by majority. In an enlisted ASB, all three members vote; in a BOI for an officer, it might be a panel of officers voting. They need a majority vote to separate. If the vote is to retain (or not enough votes to separate), the process ends there with a recommendation to retain. If they vote to separate, then they vote on characterization. Often the seriousness of the misconduct will guide whether they choose Honorable, General, or OTH (they cannot give an OTH unless you were notified that OTH was an option, which is the case if you had board rights).
Announcement of Findings and Recommendations: Once the board reaches their decision, everyone is called back in. The board president (or legal advisor) will read the findings. It might go like: “On the allegation of misconduct (ex: drug abuse), the board finds that [the misconduct is substantiated]. The board recommends that [Rank Name] be separated from the [Army/Navy/etc.]. The board further recommends his service be characterized as [Honorable/General/OTH].” If they found no basis, they’ll announce that (meaning no misconduct proven, therefore retention). If they found basis but still recommend retention (that can happen – essentially saying “yeah it happened but we think he should stay”), they will announce that. You will now know your fate at least at the board level. It’s not uncommon for a board to, for example, find the misconduct did occur but still give an Honorable discharge – especially if the member has many years of service or mitigating factors.
Post-Board Procedure: The board’s recommendation isn’t officially final until the separation authority (usually a senior officer, like a Brigade Commander or General for enlisted, or Secretary-level for officers) approves it. In practice, if the board said retain, you stay. If they said separate with X characterization, it usually gets approved and executed. You and your counsel can submit a final rebuttal or matters to the separation authority if you want to try and sway characterization or some outcome, but usually the authority won’t overturn the board’s recommendation unless something was procedurally wrong. If you’re being separated, you’ll go through the out-processing for discharge. If you’re retained, you go back to duty (often to a new unit or under some conditions, depending on the scenario).

Throughout this process, the board is guided by a legal advisor who ensures they follow the proper procedure and standard of proof. Remember that unlike a court-martial, the formal rules of evidence don’t apply strictly, but you do have the burden of proof on the government (they must convince the board that it’s more likely than not you did what they allege). If they don’t meet that burden, the board should not separate you.

Understanding these steps can greatly reduce anxiety because you’ll know what’s coming next at each phase of the hearing. Nothing will be a surprise. You can mentally tick off each stage and stay focused.

What the Board Prioritizes and How Decisions Are Made

Board members are usually officers (and sometimes senior enlisted for enlisted boards) who have been in the service a long time. They’ve likely seen exemplary careers and also disciplinary problems. When they sit on your board, here’s what they tend to focus on and how you can align your defense to those priorities:

Duty Performance and Potential: One of the biggest questions in board members’ minds: “Can this person still be of use to the military, or has their performance/behavior made them unsuitable for further service?” They will weigh your past duty performance heavily. That’s why positive NCOERs, Fitreps, awards, and senior leader endorsements are so valuable – they speak to your potential. If you can show that aside from the current issue, you’ve been a solid or outstanding troop, the board is more likely to think retention is warranted. Make sure your case hammers home your contributions (years of service, deployments, leadership roles, technical skills, etc.). Board members often have to imagine you under their command – would they want you in their unit? Give them reasons to say “yes.”
Seriousness of Misconduct: On the other side, they will consider how serious the alleged misconduct or reason for separation is. Certain offenses (e.g. drug distribution, sexual misconduct, violent offenses, repeated insubordination) will weigh very heavily toward separation because they cut to the heart of trust and military values. If your case involves something like that, you need to present strong mitigating evidence or rehabilitation evidence to overcome it (if possible). For less serious issues (e.g. one-time use of marijuana, a DUI with no injuries, a pattern of minor infractions), the board might be more on the fence and open to retaining if convinced you won’t repeat these mistakes. They’ll ask: was this a one-time lapse or part of a continuing problem? You should be prepared to show it’s the former, not the latter.
Pattern of Behavior: Boards look for patterns. If your record shows a pattern of misconduct or substandard performance, it’s harder to win them over. In that case, you must show either that the pattern is not as clear as it seems (perhaps there were reasons behind multiple incidents that you’ve since fixed) or that you’ve recently turned things around. If you’ve had, say, three misconduct issues in 12 months, you need to convince them that you’re not just going to be a repeat offender. Conversely, if this incident is totally out-of-character for you (e.g., you have 10 years of spotless service and then this), drive that point home. Board members are often willing to forgive a single lapse from an otherwise good soldier, but they are less inclined to overlook a chronic issue.
Quality of Evidence: Board members do consider the quality and credibility of evidence. If the government’s case is full of holes – flimsy hearsay, no eyewitnesses, just assumptions – point that out. Your attorney in closing will likely argue any reasonable doubt about whether the misconduct occurred. While it’s not a criminal trial standard, if the board isn’t 51% sure it happened, they should not separate you. On the flip side, the quality of your evidence matters too. A succinct, heartfelt letter from a commander might outweigh a generic character form letter. Real, concrete examples (“I witnessed him lead under fire and save lives”) trump generic praise (“He’s a great guy”). Boards notice when a defense is well-prepared with thorough evidence versus thrown-together last minute. Your preparation itself sends a message that you care deeply about continuing to serve.
Recommendations from Commanders: Sometimes part of the evidence is a chain of command’s recommendations or statements. For example, your immediate commander might testify or submit a memo saying “I recommend separation because…” or occasionally someone might speak on your behalf. Board members will consider those opinions, but they also know the ultimate decision is theirs. If a high-ranking person vouches for you, that’s powerful. If all your leaders want you gone, that hurts – but it’s not insurmountable if you can cast doubt on their perspective (maybe they didn’t know all the facts, or they never saw your good side). In any case, be aware of any such statements and address them. If your boss says you’re a bad apple, you might need others to counter, saying “Actually, he’s been stellar in my experience.”
Personal Appeal and Demeanor: This is a more intangible factor, but how you come across at the hearing can sway the board. If you appear sincere, respectful, and genuinely motivated to serve, board members take note. If you come off as indifferent, arrogant, or dishonest, that can sink you. Think of it like a job interview in some ways – you’re essentially interviewing to keep your job. They’re evaluating your attitude as much as the facts. During any statement you make, show appropriate emotion (it’s okay to be a bit emotional if discussing something heartfelt, but maintain composure). Make eye contact. Thank the board for their time at the end. These little things leave an impression.
Balance of Service Record vs. Incident: Ultimately, the board’s decision often boils down to a balance: Does this service member’s overall record and potential outweigh the negative of this incident (or incidents)? If you have a slew of positive evidence that outweighs the negative evidence, make sure the board sees that clearly. For example, physically showing a stack of your awards and evals versus one incident report can be symbolic. Some defense counsel actually lay out all the member’s medals or a thick binder of accomplishments next to the thin packet of alleged misconduct – visually signaling “this is 1% of his career vs 99% good.” You can’t literally do that in all cases, but you can paint that picture in argument and evidence. Emphasize your longevity and dedication (“I’ve served 12 years, including two combat deployments…”) against the relatively short duration of the misconduct (“…and this one night of poor judgment shouldn’t erase all of that.”). Many board members will give the benefit of the doubt to someone with a long, good service if they think the person can still be of value. Conversely, if you’re newer and had a serious slip, you need to show them that, if retained, your future performance will make up for this (because you might not have a long past to lean on).

In making their decision, board members are guided by regulations and their own judgment. They often genuinely agonize over cases – these aren’t simple decisions when someone’s career hangs in the balance. Your job (with your counsel) is to give them every reason to decide in your favor and as few reasons as possible to go the other way. By presenting a strong mix of factual defense (where applicable) and emotional/character evidence, you appeal to both their logical side and their sense of fairness/mercy. That balanced approach is usually most effective.

Emotional and Mental Preparation for the Process

Preparing for the practical aspects of an ASB is one thing – but preparing yourself emotionally is just as important. Facing the possibility of being forced out of the service can stir up a lot of feelings: stress, anger, fear of the unknown, embarrassment, etc. Taking care of your mental and emotional well-being will help you perform better during the board and cope with the outcome after. Here are some tips:

Build a Support System: Don’t go through this alone. Reach out to trusted friends or family members who can lend an ear during the preparation process. Sometimes just talking about your worries or walking someone through what’s happening can relieve stress and give you perspective. If you’re comfortable, let a few close comrades know you’re facing a board – you might be surprised how supportive people can be, and they may even offer to write a letter or testify for you. A support system will help remind you that you have worth beyond this situation, no matter the outcome.
Consider Speaking with a Professional: Many bases have counseling services or Military OneSource that provide free, confidential counseling. Talking to a counselor or therapist doesn’t mean you’re weak; it means you’re proactively dealing with stress. They can teach coping strategies for anxiety (like breathing exercises, or ways to challenge negative thoughts) that can be very handy both leading up to and on the day of the board. If you have serious anxiety, a mental health professional can also document it, which could potentially be a mitigating factor if, say, that anxiety or an underlying issue contributed to any problems (but that’s secondary – the main point is to take care of you).
Keep Perspective: It’s easy to catastrophize – to think, “If I get discharged, my life is over.” While an adverse discharge is certainly a serious setback, it’s not the end of your life or even necessarily your career. Many people recover from it, go to college or start new careers, some even get discharge upgrades later. While you should fight hard to stay in if that’s what you want, also remind yourself that you will be okay no matter what. Sometimes telling yourself, “I’m going to put 100% into this defense, but if it doesn’t work out, I can and will adapt and overcome,” can reduce the all-or-nothing panic that might otherwise paralyze you. Ironically, accepting that you’ll handle whatever happens can make you perform better at the board because you won’t be as consumed by fear.
Visualize Success: This might sound a bit new-agey, but visualization is a technique athletes and leaders use to prepare for high-stress events. Take some quiet time to actually imagine yourself in the hearing room, looking confident, answering questions calmly, and hearing the board president say “recommend retention” or “Honorable discharge.” By visualizing the positive outcome and the process to get there, you train your brain to believe it’s achievable and you reduce the intimidation factor. Conversely, don’t spend all your time imagining doom and gloom – that can become a self-fulfilling prophecy in how you present yourself.
Healthy Habits: In the lead-up to the board, try to maintain healthy routines. Avoid excessive alcohol or other unhealthy coping mechanisms – they ultimately make anxiety and depression worse and could lead to any missteps that the command might notice. Exercise regularly, even if just a short run or gym session; physical activity burns off stress hormones and can improve your mood and sleep. Get enough sleep, especially the night before the hearing – being rested will significantly improve your ability to think clearly and stay composed. If you find your mind racing at night, practice a relaxation technique (there are smartphone apps for meditation or even the old military trick of relaxed breathing and muscle relaxation).
Plan for the Day of the Hearing: Nerves will be highest that day. Plan simple things to keep you centered: eat a decent breakfast (even if your stomach is in knots, get some nutrition in – you don’t want to faint or have brain fog from hunger). Bring a bottle of water to the hearing (your mouth might get dry when you speak). Have a notepad to jot down thoughts during the hearing – sometimes writing notes can channel nervous energy and also helps you remember things to tell your lawyer for cross or argument. Some people take a short walk or listen to a favorite motivational song beforehand to get in the right headspace. Do whatever works for you to get the jitters out. Talk to your attorney right before going in; a brief pep talk from them can reassure you that you’re prepared.
During the Hearing – Stay Grounded: While the hearing is happening, keep your focus in the moment. Don’t dwell on “Oh no, that witness’s comment sounded really bad for me” – you’ll have time to address it in cross or rebuttal. Instead, maybe scribble a note to your lawyer if you think of something, and then let it go from your immediate concern. Trust the process you prepared for. If you feel yourself emotionally reacting (like getting angry at a statement or feeling like you want to cry), take slow breaths and detach a bit – remember the role you’re in: you are presenting as a professional advocating for yourself. You can process the emotions later, but right now channel them into determination to show the board the real you. Some people find it grounding to remember why they joined the military in the first place – that pride can help steady you when your commitment is questioned.

No matter how the board ends, be proud that you stood up for yourself and went through this challenging process. If the news is good (retention or a favorable discharge), you’ll feel an immense relief and validation. If it’s not what you hoped, you’ll understandably be upset – lean on your support network then especially. But also hold your head high knowing you gave it your all and that one chapter ending just means another will begin. Emotional resilience is key in the military; this is one of those times it really gets tested, but you can come out stronger for it.

Facing an Administrative Separation Board is undoubtedly stressful, but armed with knowledge and thorough preparation, you give yourself the best possible chance at a positive result. By following a step-by-step preparation plan, gathering strong evidence, securing supportive witnesses, and understanding how to navigate the hearing, you transform from a passive participant into an active advocate for your own career. Remember to leverage your rights, never shy away from telling your side of the story, and challenge any narrative that downplays your service or exaggerates your shortcomings. The board will see a service member who is responsible, resilient, and worth fighting for – which can go a long way in convincing them to return a favorable decision.

Throughout this journey, stay focused on the facts and the big picture of your service. And no matter the outcome, carry yourself with the pride of someone who served honorably and stood up for themselves when it mattered. Good luck at your hearing – and know that preparation, honesty, and dedication are your best allies in the room.

Learn More About Administrative Separation Defense

If you are facing an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) or Board of Inquiry (BOI), you need every advantage possible. Our firm has prepared in-depth guides on the key aspects of administrative separation to help you maximize your chances of success.

Below are essential articles that dive deeper into strategy, preparation, and common pitfalls.

🔎 Explore More: Visit Our Administrative Separation Defense Page

The NSLF Elite Administrative Separation Defense Package

Your Military Career Is on the Line. We’re the Elite Legal Team That Will Fight for You.

Flat Fee: $9,995 – No hidden fees. Travel included. Money-Back Guarantee.**

What You Get:

✅ Battle-Tested Trial Attorneys – Led by Carl Marrone, a former Army JAG and career trial lawyer who thrives in high-stakes cases. ✅ 100% Focused on Winning – We don’t take on cases to settle. We take them to win. ✅ Comprehensive Case Strategy – We prepare like it’s a court-martial. Deep legal research, cross-examination planning, and evidence review. ✅ Aggressive Advocacy, Smart Execution – We fight hard, but we know when to push and when to hold back. Boards don’t respond well to combative lawyers – we master the balance. ✅ Custom-Tailored Defense – Every case is unique, and we develop a strategy built around YOUR situation. ✅ Military Background Matters – Unlike many civilian attorneys handling military cases, our attorneys are former military prosecutors and defense lawyers. ✅ Command Negotiations – We engage with your command to fight for the best possible outcome before the board even happens. ✅ Pre-Board Preparation – We coach you for your testimony, ensuring you are fully prepared to face the board with confidence. ✅ TDS is Overworked – We Are Not – Your free military lawyer has dozens of cases; we only take on a limited number to ensure each case gets 100% focus. ✅ Fast, Direct Communication – You get a dedicated attorney working on your case, not a rotating cast of JAG lawyers. ✅ All Travel Costs Covered – No surprise expenses. We fly to you, wherever you are. ✅ 24/7 Support – Urgent question? We’re here. You’re not just a case number to us. ✅ Extensive Cross-Examination Experience – We shred weak government witnesses and destroy questionable testimony. ✅ Board Psychology Experts – We understand how separation boards think and decide cases, so we present your defense in a way that wins them over.

**The NSLF MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE

💰 If your command is seeking discharge under Other Than Honorable (OTH), we GUARANTEE that we will get you at least a General Under Honorable Conditions (or better)—or we refund 100% of your money.

👊 Better means:

HONORABLE DISCHARGE ✅
RETENTION IN THE MILITARY ✅

If we don’t deliver, you get every penny back. No risk. No excuses.

Why This Offer Is a No-Brainer

💥 Your military career, benefits, and future employment are at stake. A bad discharge follows you for life.
💥 You’re fighting a battle – you need an elite legal warrior in your corner. 💥 TDS attorneys are juggling too many cases – we dedicate ourselves to yours. 💥 We stand behind our commitment to excellence—if we don’t secure the results we guarantee, you receive a full refund.

📞 Call Now: (202) 600-4996
📅 Book a Free Consultation: Click Here
⭐ Read Our Amazing Reviews: Google Reviews
💰 Flexible Legal Financing Available: Learn More

At National Security Law Firm, we don’t back down from a fight. We take on the toughest cases and deliver the strongest defenses. Carl Marrone is just one of our battle-hardened trial attorneys who stands ready to fight for you.

If you are facing administrative separation, don’t wait. Call us today. Your career, your rank, and your future are on the line. Let us take up the fight for you.

The National Security Law Firm: IT’S OUR TURN TO FIGHT FOR YOU!