Administrative separation (ADSEP) is the military’s process for involuntarily discharging service members for misconduct, substandard performance, or other reasons. It is governed by Department of Defense instructions and service regulations (e.g. DoDI 1332.14 for enlisted, DoDI 1332.30 for officers, and service-specific rules like AR 635-200 for Army or the Navy MILPERSMAN 1910 series)
An administrative separation board is not a criminal trial, but it’s a formal proceeding that can end a military career and affect veterans’ benefits. Unfortunately, many service members make critical mistakes during this process that lead to unfavorable outcomes. This step-by-step guide outlines the top mistakes to avoid – and how to handle the process correctly – with references to the relevant regulations for support.
1. Failing to Prepare and Missing Key Deadlines
One of the most common and serious mistakes is walking into the separation process unprepared. Failure to understand the process and meet deadlines can be fatal to your case. For example, when you receive a separation notification, you usually have a short window (often 7 working days in the Army) to respond and elect your rights (such as requesting a board hearing). Missing this deadline automatically waives your rights to a board hearing and other defenses in many cases. Always acknowledge receipt of the notification immediately and indicate your intentions before the deadline, even if you intend to fight the separation.
Know your entitlement to a board: If you have 6 or more years of service, or if the command is pursuing an Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharge, you are entitled to an administrative separation board hearing. Service members with less time in service (and not facing OTH) can be separated without a board (“notification procedure”) but can receive no worse than a General discharge. A common mistake is not realizing you qualify for a board and inadvertently waiving it by not responding in time. Read your separation notice carefully – it will cite the authority (e.g. AR 635-200 or NAVPERS 1910) and should state if you have board rights. Immediately consult a defense attorney (military or civilian) upon notification to clarify your rights and the timeline.
Gather evidence early: Don’t wait until the last minute to start collecting evidence and witnesses for your defense. A strong defense requires thorough preparation, including gathering documents, witness statements, and understanding the legal basis for the separation. Common pitfalls include assuming your command will automatically provide all favorable records or that you can submit evidence at any time – in reality, you should assemble supporting documents as early as possible. Important items often used in separation boards include evaluation reports, awards, certificates, positive counseling statements, and character reference letters. You can also prepare a personal statement explaining your side of the story or expressing remorse and desire to continue service. Start identifying and securing these items as soon as you learn of the separation action, so you don’t run out of time before the board.
2. Delaying Hiring a Qualified Civilian Lawyer
Another major mistake is waiting too long to get experienced legal counsel on your side. Every service member facing an admin board will be offered a free military defense attorney (e.g. Army Trial Defense Service, Navy/USMC Defense Service Office, Air Force Area Defense Counsel). However, relying on that alone and not even consulting a private attorney early can put you at a disadvantage. Military-appointed attorneys are dedicated, but they often juggle heavy caseloads and may not have specialized experience in contested board hearings. By contrast, an experienced civilian military lawyer can devote more time and a focused strategy to your case.
Don’t wait until the last minute to seek outside counsel. The administrative separation timeline moves quickly – sometimes the board hearing is scheduled only a couple of weeks after notification. Hiring a civilian lawyer early gives them time to investigate, gather evidence, line up witnesses, and prepare your case. If you delay, you might find that private lawyers have less time to help or that evidence (like witness memories or documents) becomes harder to obtain. Engaging a qualified civilian defense counsel as soon as possible is an investment that can significantly improve your chances of a favorable outcome. (You still keep your free JAG/TDS lawyer as well – you are allowed to have both, and in fact, your civilian attorney can work alongside the appointed military counsel for additional support.) The key is not to lose precious preparation time; even a few weeks of early preparation can make a big difference in assembling a strong defense.
3. Relying Only on Free Military Defense Counsel (TDS/ADC)
Many service members make the mistake of not fully utilizing their right to counsel, or assuming the appointed military lawyer alone is enough without actively collaborating. While your free military defense attorney (Trial Defense Service, etc.) is a valuable resource, remember that you have the right to retain a civilian attorney at your own expense in addition to or instead of the appointed counsel. Military regulations explicitly advise that you may consult with military or civilian counsel when facing separation. Failing to explore this option can be a mistake, especially for complex or high-stakes cases (for example, if you are near retirement or an OTH discharge is on the table).
Understand the limitations of free counsel: Court-appointed military lawyers often handle many cases simultaneously. This can limit the time they can spend on each case. They might not have the bandwidth to track down every witness or comb through hundreds of pages of records for you. Moreover, if your case involves unique issues (like medical conditions or complicated legal nuances), a specialist civilian attorney could bring in expertise that a general military attorney might not possess. By relying solely on an overburdened defense counsel, you risk a less thorough defense. As one legal guide notes, appointed attorneys “handle numerous cases” and may not be able to focus entirely on your board, whereas a seasoned civilian lawyer provides personalized attention and strategy. The ideal approach is to use all available resources: work with your assigned JAG lawyer and consider hiring a civilian lawyer for additional firepower. At minimum, consult with a civilian attorney early on – even if you ultimately stick with your free counsel, you’ll gain perspective on your case and ensure you’re not missing any opportunities.
4. Misunderstanding the Burden of Proof (Being Too Passive in Your Defense)
A dangerous misunderstanding is thinking that because “the government has the burden of proof,” you as the respondent don’t need to present much in your own defense. Yes, the government must prove the grounds for separation by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning it’s more likely than not that the misconduct or reason for separation occurred). The board will determine for each allegation whether this standard is met. However, this does not mean you should sit back and do nothing. In an administrative board, the rules are more relaxed than a court-martial – hearsay and written statements can be considered. If you don’t actively counter the government’s evidence, the board is likely to find that the allegations are substantiated by that preponderance of evidence.
Service members must actively present their own case. It’s a mistake to assume the board will “give you the benefit of the doubt” or discover extenuating facts on their own. Unlike a civilian court where you might remain silent and hope the prosecution fails, an ADSEP board expects to hear your side of the story and see your evidence. You should present any evidence that casts doubt on the allegations or mitigates your conduct – for example, contradictory witness statements, an alibi, evidence of procedural errors in an investigation, or context that explains the circumstances. Even if the facts of an incident are mostly true, you can present mitigation and character evidence to argue for retention or a better discharge characterization. Remember that after determining whether the alleged basis is proven, the board also decides whether you should be retained or separated and with what character of discharge. That decision can hinge on what kind of soldier, Marine, airman, or sailor you convince them you are. If you present nothing positive about yourself, the board only hears the negative.
Put simply, not fighting for yourself is a mistake. You cannot rely on a technical “burden of proof” argument alone. Even if the government’s case is weak, bolster your position by highlighting your good military record, demonstrating rehabilitation efforts, and showing them reasons to give you a second chance. Military boards consider both the evidence of the alleged misconduct and the service member’s whole person record. If you misunderstand this and fail to present a robust defense, you are essentially surrendering that advantage. Always remember: you (and your counsel) have the right to present evidence, call witnesses, and challenge the government’s case – exercise those rights fully.
5. Deciding Not to Testify or Make a Statement in Your Defense
Facing a board, some service members elect to remain silent, perhaps hoping not to incriminate themselves or believing their record “speaks for itself.” In many cases, choosing not to testify or address the board is a mistake – especially for senior enlisted members (E-7 and above) and officers. Administrative separation boards typically offer three choices: you can testify under oath, remain silent, or give an unsworn statement (a statement not under oath that isn’t subject to cross-examination). While there may be tactical reasons in rare cases to stay silent, most of the time it is crucial to give your own account of events or a statement on your behalf.
For senior personnel, the board often expects to hear from you directly. Remember, these boards are made up of fellow service members (often officers and senior NCOs). If, for example, a Master Sergeant or a Navy Chief is accused of misconduct and then says nothing at the board, the members might interpret that as a lack of contrition or an inability to defend one’s actions. Your testimony is an opportunity to personally appeal to the board’s sense of fairness, responsibility, and mercy. You can clarify misunderstandings, acknowledge any mistakes you did make, and demonstrate your values. If you committed an offense and there’s evidence of it, admitting fault and showing genuine remorse in testimony can sometimes persuade a board to recommend a General discharge rather than an OTH, or even retention on a probationary status. If you have a strong defense that the allegations are untrue, your sworn testimony denying the allegations can be powerful, especially if backed by other evidence or witnesses.
For officers, note that separation proceedings (Boards of Inquiry) are often referred to as “show cause” boards – meaning you are ordered to show cause for retention (essentially to prove why you should be allowed to continue serving). Failing to speak in that context could virtually ensure an adverse result. At a minimum, consider making an unsworn statement if you or your counsel fear hostile cross-examination. An unsworn statement (oral or written) lets you tell your side or express your desire to continue serving, without questioning from the recorder. The board can’t cross-examine an unsworn statement, but they will still weigh it. Bottom line: Don’t forfeit your chance to be heard. With guidance from your lawyer, plan for either testimony or a statement. This is your career on the line – your voice can make a difference in how the board members perceive you beyond the paper files.
6. Using Overly Aggressive or Disrespectful Defense Tactics 
An administrative board is composed of human beings – usually officers and sometimes senior enlisted peers – who will make a recommendation about your future. Alienating or offending them with an overly aggressive defense is a serious mistake. Some service members (or their lawyers) think that a “scorched earth” approach – attacking commanders, objecting to every piece of evidence, or displaying open hostility – will win the day. In reality, board members are looking for facts, respect, and professionalism, not courtroom theatrics. If your defense counsel comes off as hyper-aggressive or rude, it may sour the board members and hurt your case. The same goes for your own demeanor at the hearing: if you appear defiant, sarcastic, or disrespectful, the board will notice.
Maintain military bearing and respect throughout the process. You and your counsel can (and should) vigorously contest unfair or untrue evidence, but do so in a professional manner. Focus on the evidence and arguments that matter, not on personal attacks against the chain of command. For example, if you need to challenge your commander’s testimony, you can do so by calmly pointing out inconsistencies or motives, without using disrespectful language or tone. An overly combative approach might make the board defensive or sympathetic to the witnesses you’re attacking. Remember that board members often have many years of service; they expect a certain decorum. One legal advisory notes that while it might seem an extremely aggressive lawyer is ideal, that approach “can often backfire” because the board values diplomacy and respect.
Tip: Aim for a credible and earnest defense, not a blustering one. A defense that acknowledges obvious wrongdoing but explains context and growth will usually go further than one that denies everything and disparages everyone. If you did something wrong, don’t insult the board’s intelligence by trying to prove the sky is green – instead, take responsibility where appropriate and pivot to why you can still be a valuable service member. The board will appreciate honesty and humility. In short, passion is fine; disrespect is not. Avoid defense tactics that cross the line from zealous to antagonistic, and you’ll keep the board receptive to your arguments.
7. Presenting Evidence Poorly – “Document Dumps” vs. Strategic Evidence
How you present evidence to the board can greatly influence their decision. A common mistake is to dump a huge stack of documents on the board members without context or emphasis, hoping that somewhere in that pile is information that will save you. Board members are not investigators – if you overwhelm them with unorganized paperwork, they may miss the key points you needed them to see. For example, handing the board a 200-page packet of every evaluation and letter you’ve ever received, without highlighting what’s important, can cause critical details to get lost. Quality of evidence is far more important than quantity.
Be strategic in your evidence presentation: Instead of a “document dump,” curate your evidence and guide the board through it. Pull out the most compelling pieces that support your case – such as a glowing medal citation, a high-stakes qualification certificate, a letter from a commander praising your character, or recent training certificates showing rehabilitation. Highlight or tab the sections of documents you especially want the board to notice. During the hearing, your attorney can refer the board to specific exhibits (“please take a look at Exhibit D, Sergeant X’s NCOER for last year, and note the remarks about his leadership”). This approach ensures the board actually considers the favorable evidence.
Additionally, make use of character witnesses and written statements. Personal letters from supervisors, peers, or subordinates attesting to your good qualities can be very persuasive if they speak to your rehabilitation potential or value to the unit. Choose people who can credibly vouch for you. A handful of sincere, specific character statements will carry more weight than dozens of form letters. You should submit documentation of good service – awards, certificates of appreciation, character statements from peers, letters from family and friends, etc. – that aligns with the outcome you seek. For instance, if you’re trying to stay in, you’d include letters expressing confidence in your ability to continue serving (whereas if you simply want a better discharge, letters might focus on your positive traits for civilian life).
Organize and summarize: It helps to provide the board a one-page summary or index of your exhibits, with a brief note on what each item is and why it matters. This way, even if the board members don’t read every page word-for-word, they grasp the highlights of your defense. In short, avoid drowning the board in paper. Instead, select the most powerful evidence and make it easy for the board to digest. Clear, well-organized evidence presentation shows respect for the board’s time and helps them remember the points that favor you.
8. Overlooking the Value of Expert Witnesses
In cases involving technical or specialized issues, failing to use an expert witness can be a missed opportunity. The board members are typically not experts in things like forensic science, medicine, or behavioral health – so if your case hinges on such areas, an expert’s testimony could be crucial. For example, in a drug-related separation, an expert in toxicology or the drug testing process could testify about the possibility of false positives or lab errors. In a case involving PTSD or mental health, a psychologist or psychiatrist could explain how your condition may have contributed to the incidents, providing important context and mitigation. If you have a line of duty injury or medical issues, a doctor’s testimony (or written statement) might counter the narrative that you’re simply a bad soldier.
Many service members don’t realize they can present expert testimony at an administrative board. While the military won’t usually provide or pay for an expert for you in an admin proceeding, you are allowed to introduce expert evidence on your own (through a hired expert or sometimes a military doctor willing to speak). And the effect can be powerful: expert insight can create reasonable doubt or at least understanding that wouldn’t exist otherwise.
Consider whether an expert can help your case: Discuss with your attorney if any aspect of the allegations could be clarified by expert knowledge. If so, it may be worth obtaining a written report or live testimony from a qualified expert. Even a letter from, say, a physician or an engineer (depending on the issue) might carry weight if it speaks to the evidence. Make sure any expert is truly credentialed and credible – their input should be factual and professional, not just advocacy. Used judiciously, experts can bolster your defense with objectivity, showing the board that there’s more to the story than meets the eye. Not using one when your case really calls for it is a mistake that could leave persuasive evidence off the table.
9. Signing a Board Waiver Without Legal Advice (and When a Waiver Makes Sense)
Perhaps the gravest mistake is waiving your right to a board hearing (or accepting an adverse discharge) without fully understanding the consequences. When notified of separation, if you are entitled to a board, you will have the option to waive (give up) that board in writing. Never sign a waiver of your rights without consulting an attorney. Waiving the board means you forfeit the chance to appear before a panel and defend yourself – in other words, you’re at the mercy of the chain of command’s recommendations. Many commands might offer or encourage a waiver to speed up the process. Sometimes they even dangle incentives, like hinting that if you waive, they’ll recommend a General discharge instead of an OTH. But you need to be very cautious: once you waive, you cannot easily undo it (withdrawals are only allowed up until the separation is approved), and you’ve essentially agreed to be separated based solely on the paperwork.
Consult counsel before any waiver: A lawyer can assess whether the evidence against you is strong or weak and advise if a board hearing is worth the risk. In many cases, fighting the board is worthwhile because you have a chance to be retained or to convince the board to recommend a higher discharge characterization. If you waive, you remove that possibility. Additionally, a waiver might be unconditional or conditional. A conditional waiver means you agree to waive the board hearing only if you get a certain outcome (for example, you’ll waive the board if the separation authority guarantees an Honorable or General discharge). This must be in writing and approved by the separation authority. A conditional waiver can make sense if you and your counsel conclude that (a) the evidence of misconduct is overwhelming and a board is very likely to vote for separation, and (b) the command is willing to give a decent discharge in exchange for no board. For instance, if you’re facing an OTH for a serious offense but the convening authority offers a deal for a General discharge if you waive, you might accept that to protect your veteran benefits. Only a commander with separation authority can approve that deal, and if they disapprove it, you still keep your board rights.
On the other hand, unconditional waivers (waiving with no strings attached) are very risky and usually not advised without strong reason. By unconditionally waiving, you’re essentially saying “do whatever you want, I won’t fight.” This could result in an OTH on your record if that’s what was being pursued, with no opportunity for you to argue for something better. Before signing anything, discuss every option with a lawyer. In short, do not sign away your right to a board lightly. The waiver option exists mainly to benefit the service (efficiency) or to allow a truly voluntary separation, not to help the member. Use it only if a clear, guaranteed benefit outweighs your chance to fight. And remember, even if you initially elect a board, you can change your mind and submit a waiver later if circumstances change – but you can’t easily do the reverse. Once a waiver is executed and approved, you’ve closed the door on the board. So, keep that door open until you and your counsel are absolutely sure waiving is the best course.
Navigating an administrative separation can be daunting, but by avoiding these common mistakes, you greatly improve your odds of a favorable outcome. Educate yourself on the process and your rights (read the pertinent regulations like DoDI 1332.14, DoDI 1332.30, your service’s separation manual), meet every deadline, and engage competent legal counsel early. Take an active role in your defense: gather evidence, line up witnesses (including experts if needed), and present your case professionally and clearly. Don’t fall into the traps of passivity, lack of preparation, or rash decisions under pressure. With careful preparation and the right approach, you give the separation board reason to decide in your favor, or at least to grant the best possible characterization of service. Even in the worst-case scenario, handling the process properly sets you up for potential appeals or discharge upgrades later. Above all, protect your rights and take this process seriously from day one – your military career and benefits are on the line. Good luck, and remember that knowledge and preparation are your best allies in facing an administrative separation board.
At National Security Law Firm, we don’t back down from a fight. We take on the toughest cases and deliver the strongest defenses. Carl Marrone is just one of our battle-hardened trial attorneys who stands ready to fight for you.
If you are facing administrative separation, don’t wait. Call us today. Your career, your rank, and your future are on the line. Let us take up the fight for you.
Learn More About Administrative Separation Defense
If you are facing an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) or Board of Inquiry (BOI), you need every advantage possible. Our firm has prepared in-depth guides on the key aspects of administrative separation to help you maximize your chances of success.
Below are essential articles that dive deeper into strategy, preparation, and common pitfalls.
🔎 Explore More: Visit Our Administrative Separation Defense Page
The NSLF Elite Administrative Separation Defense Package
Your Military Career Is on the Line. We’re the Elite Legal Team That Will Fight for You.
Flat Fee: $9,995 – No hidden fees. Travel included. Money-Back Guarantee.**
What You Get:
✅ Battle-Tested Trial Attorneys – Led by Carl Marrone, a former Army JAG and career trial lawyer who thrives in high-stakes cases. ✅ 100% Focused on Winning – We don’t take on cases to settle. We take them to win. ✅ Comprehensive Case Strategy – We prepare like it’s a court-martial. Deep legal research, cross-examination planning, and evidence review. ✅ Aggressive Advocacy, Smart Execution – We fight hard, but we know when to push and when to hold back. Boards don’t respond well to combative lawyers – we master the balance. ✅ Custom-Tailored Defense – Every case is unique, and we develop a strategy built around YOUR situation. ✅ Military Background Matters – Unlike many civilian attorneys handling military cases, our attorneys are former military prosecutors and defense lawyers. ✅ Command Negotiations – We engage with your command to fight for the best possible outcome before the board even happens. ✅ Pre-Board Preparation – We coach you for your testimony, ensuring you are fully prepared to face the board with confidence. ✅ TDS is Overworked – We Are Not – Your free military lawyer has dozens of cases; we only take on a limited number to ensure each case gets 100% focus. ✅ Fast, Direct Communication – You get a dedicated attorney working on your case, not a rotating cast of JAG lawyers. ✅ All Travel Costs Covered – No surprise expenses. We fly to you, wherever you are. ✅ 24/7 Support – Urgent question? We’re here. You’re not just a case number to us. ✅ Extensive Cross-Examination Experience – We shred weak government witnesses and destroy questionable testimony. ✅ Board Psychology Experts – We understand how separation boards think and decide cases, so we present your defense in a way that wins them over.
**The NSLF MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE
💰 If your command is seeking discharge under Other Than Honorable (OTH), we GUARANTEE that we will get you at least a General Under Honorable Conditions (or better)—or we refund 100% of your money.
👊 Better means:
- HONORABLE DISCHARGE ✅
- RETENTION IN THE MILITARY ✅
If we don’t deliver, you get every penny back. No risk. No excuses.
Why This Offer Is a No-Brainer
💥 Your military career, benefits, and future employment are at stake. A bad discharge follows you for life.
💥 You’re fighting a battle – you need an elite legal warrior in your corner. 💥 TDS attorneys are juggling too many cases – we dedicate ourselves to yours. 💥 We stand behind our commitment to excellence—if we don’t secure the results we guarantee, you receive a full refund.
Take Action Now – Your Military Career Is on the Line
Avoiding mistakes in the administrative separation process starts with the right legal team in your corner. A misstep could cost you your rank, benefits, and reputation—but with National Security Law Firm, you don’t have to face this battle alone.
We specialize in aggressive, strategic, and results-driven representation for service members facing Administrative Separation Boards (ASB) and Boards of Inquiry (BOI). Our attorneys are former military prosecutors and defense counsel who know exactly how to navigate these proceedings—and how to win.
Don’t Wait—Every Day Counts
📞 Call Now: (202) 600-4996
📅 Book a Free Consultation: Click Here
⭐ Read Our Amazing Reviews: Google Reviews
💰 Flexible Legal Financing Available: Learn More
Don’t make the mistake of waiting too long or going into your board unprepared. At NSLF, we fight for your career as if it were our own.
National Security Law Firm: IT’S OUR TURN TO FIGHT FOR YOU!