You served the United States. Whether you separated six months ago or decades ago, your military service may still provide a path to U.S. citizenship.

But naturalization becomes more complicated after a service member leaves the military.

The command that once maintained your records may no longer exist. Your DD Form 214 may be incomplete. Form N-426 may no longer be the proper evidence. You may have multiple enlistments, an uncharacterized or adverse discharge, old arrests, previous immigration proceedings, or long gaps in your immigration history.

The passage of time does not necessarily eliminate eligibility—especially for veterans who served during a designated period of hostilities under INA § 329. It does, however, change the evidence, legal requirements, and filing strategy.

National Security Law Firm represents veterans seeking citizenship through prior military service. Our attorneys evaluate:

  • Eligibility under INA § 328 or § 329
  • The effect of filing more than six months after separation
  • Whether service during hostilities supports naturalization years later
  • Honorable-service and discharge requirements
  • Multiple enlistments and periods of service
  • Missing or inconsistent military records
  • Form N-426 and post-separation evidence
  • Veterans living outside the United States
  • Criminal and disciplinary history
  • Prior removal proceedings or immigration violations
  • Whether filing Form N-400 could expose the veteran to enforcement

NSLF immigration attorney Justin M. Price has more than 25 years of legal experience, including service as:

  • A former U.S. Immigration Judge
  • A Department of Homeland Security trial attorney for more than 12 years
  • An Air Force Judge Advocate
  • A military and civilian prosecutor
  • A public defender
  • An immigration attorney representing service members, veterans, and military families

Justin has handled the issues that converge in veteran naturalization cases from every side of the system: military service, immigration eligibility, criminal records, government enforcement, credibility, removal proceedings, and naturalization adjudication.

You already completed the service. Let NSLF determine whether that service still provides a path to citizenship—and identify the risks before USCIS does.

Schedule a consultation with National Security Law Firm.

Can Veterans Become Citizens Through Prior Military Service?

Yes. A former service member may qualify for naturalization through military service even after leaving the Armed Forces.

The two principal statutory pathways are:

  • INA § 328: Naturalization based on at least one year of qualifying honorable military service
  • INA § 329: Naturalization based on qualifying honorable service during a designated period of military hostilities

The requirements are different.

A veteran who does not qualify for one provision may qualify under the other. A veteran who cannot use either military provision may still qualify under the ordinary civilian naturalization rules.

The correct analysis begins by identifying:

  1. Every period of military service;
  2. The status in which the veteran served;
  3. Whether the service occurred during a designated period of hostilities;
  4. How each period of service ended;
  5. When the veteran became a lawful permanent resident, if ever;
  6. Where the veteran enlisted, reenlisted, extended, or was inducted;
  7. When the veteran separated;
  8. Whether the veteran has criminal, disciplinary, or immigration complications; and
  9. Where the veteran currently resides.

Visit our principal guide to U.S. citizenship through military service for an overview of the broader military-naturalization process.

Naturalization for Veterans Under INA § 328

INA § 328 applies to certain applicants who served honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces for an aggregate period of at least one year.

Among other requirements, an applicant generally must establish:

  • At least one year of honorable military service
  • Lawful admission for permanent residence
  • Good moral character during the applicable period
  • If separated, separation under honorable conditions
  • Compliance with the remaining naturalization requirements

The timing of the application matters substantially under INA § 328.

Filing While Serving or Within Six Months After Separation

A person who files while still serving or within six months after the termination of qualifying service may receive significant exemptions from the ordinary continuous-residence and physical-presence requirements.

For a recently separated veteran, that six-month filing period can be extremely important.

Waiting beyond it does not necessarily make citizenship impossible, but the veteran may lose some of INA § 328’s most valuable procedural and residence benefits.

Filing More Than Six Months After Separation

A veteran who files more than six months after separation may need to satisfy the ordinary naturalization requirements under INA § 316, subject to the service-credit provisions of INA § 328.

Under INA § 328(d), qualifying honorable service during the five years before filing may count as residence and physical presence for purposes of ordinary naturalization.

This means that a veteran who separated more than six months ago may still have a viable case, but counsel must examine:

  • The date lawful permanent residence began
  • The date of separation
  • Whether military service falls within the relevant five-year period
  • Continuous residence
  • Physical presence
  • International travel
  • Current state or USCIS district residence
  • Good moral character
  • Whether another naturalization provision is stronger

A veteran should not assume that missing the six-month window permanently eliminates the value of military service.

Wartime Naturalization for Veterans Under INA § 329

INA § 329 provides a separate pathway for certain individuals who served honorably during a designated period of military hostilities.

Unlike INA § 328, INA § 329 does not require one full year of military service.

It may also permit qualifying veterans to naturalize:

  • Without the ordinary five-year residence requirement
  • Without the ordinary physical-presence requirement
  • Without residing for three months in a particular state or USCIS district
  • In some cases, without first becoming a lawful permanent resident
  • Long after the qualifying military service ended

The period beginning September 11, 2001 remains a designated period of hostilities as of this page’s legal review date.

A veteran does not need to have served in combat or deployed to a combat zone. The question is whether the veteran served honorably in a qualifying status during a designated period.

Veterans with unusual entry or permanent-residence histories should review our focused guide to wartime military naturalization under INA § 329.

Is There a Filing Deadline Under INA § 329?

INA § 329 does not impose a general requirement that the veteran apply within six months of separation.

A veteran may potentially apply years or decades after qualifying service.

The passage of time can nevertheless create practical and legal problems:

  • Military records may be difficult to locate
  • Commands may have been reorganized or deactivated
  • Witnesses may be unavailable
  • The veteran may lack a complete DD Form 214
  • Service dates may conflict
  • A discharge characterization may be disputed
  • Criminal or immigration problems may have developed after service
  • Prior applications may contain inconsistent statements
  • Overseas processing may be more difficult for a former service member

There is an important difference between having no general statutory deadline and having a simple case.

Honorable Service

Both INA § 328 and INA § 329 require qualifying honorable service.

The appropriate military department determines whether the veteran’s service was honorable and whether separation occurred under honorable conditions.

Relevant records may include:

  • DD Form 214
  • DD Form 215
  • NGB Form 22
  • Separation orders
  • Personnel records
  • Discharge orders
  • Service-department certifications
  • Discharge Review Board decisions
  • BCMR or BCNR decisions
  • Court-martial records
  • Administrative-separation records

USCIS does not ordinarily decide for itself that service was honorable when the military’s official records say otherwise.

Favorable evaluations, awards, deployments, and commander statements may be important evidence, but they do not automatically override an official adverse discharge.

When Does Discharge Characterization Matter?

Discharge characterization can determine whether a separated veteran qualifies under INA § 328 or § 329.

Honorable Discharge

An Honorable discharge generally satisfies the requirement that separation occurred under honorable conditions, assuming the underlying service otherwise qualifies.

General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions

A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge may satisfy a statutory requirement that separation be under honorable conditions. The complete service history and military certification still matter.

Uncharacterized Discharge

USCIS changed its treatment of uncharacterized discharges following a Department of Defense policy change.

Under current USCIS guidance:

  • An uncharacterized discharge issued before August 1, 2024 may satisfy the “under honorable conditions” separation requirement.
  • An uncharacterized discharge issued on or after August 1, 2024 does not satisfy that requirement under INA § 328 or § 329.

Read our complete guide to military naturalization with an uncharacterized discharge.

Other Than Honorable Discharge

An OTH discharge generally does not qualify as a separation under honorable conditions.

The effect can depend on:

  • Which statutory provision applies
  • Which service period supports the application
  • Whether there were multiple enlistments
  • Whether the record is accurate
  • Whether upgrade or correction relief is available
  • Whether the underlying misconduct creates other immigration consequences

Bad-Conduct or Dishonorable Discharge

Bad-conduct and dishonorable discharges are punitive discharges imposed by courts-martial. They can create both character-of-service and criminal-immigration problems.

A military board may have limited authority to review or correct these records depending on the type of court-martial and requested relief.

Veterans with adverse characterizations should read about military naturalization after an OTH, bad-conduct, or dishonorable discharge.

Multiple Enlistments and Periods of Service

A veteran may have:

  • An honorable initial enlistment followed by an OTH discharge
  • Active-duty service followed by reserve service
  • A conditional discharge for immediate reenlistment
  • A break in service
  • Different characterizations for separate periods
  • Multiple DD Forms 214
  • Qualifying wartime service during only one period
  • A final adverse separation after earlier honorable service

These cases require a period-by-period analysis.

Under INA § 328, the statute makes discharges from other periods of military service relevant. A veteran may not necessarily isolate one favorable enlistment and disregard a later adverse discharge.

Under INA § 329, counsel must identify the particular qualifying wartime service and determine whether the separation from that service occurred under honorable conditions.

NSLF maps:

  • Enlistment dates
  • Reenlistments
  • Extensions
  • Conditional discharges
  • Duty status
  • Service during hostilities
  • Breaks in service
  • Each characterization of discharge
  • The relationship among separate military records

A single DD Form 214 may not tell the complete story.

Form N-426 After Separation

Form N-426, Request for Certification of Military or Naval Service, is primarily used by current service members to obtain official certification of qualifying service.

Separated veterans generally prove service and character of separation through official military documents, including:

  • DD Form 214
  • DD Form 215
  • NGB Form 22
  • Separation orders
  • Other authenticated service records

A veteran should not assume that a former commander can sign a new Form N-426 and override an official discharge document.

If the discharge or service record is inaccurate, the appropriate remedy may involve:

  • Administrative correction
  • DD Form 215
  • Discharge Review Board application
  • BCMR or BCNR petition
  • Correction of service dates
  • Correction of duty status
  • A new service-department certification after the underlying record is corrected

Learn more about Form N-426 problems in military naturalization cases.

Locating Old Military Records

Veterans often lack the documents needed to prove prior service.

Records may have been:

  • Lost during a move
  • Destroyed
  • Stored under a different name or service number
  • Divided among several military systems
  • Archived after separation
  • Transferred to the National Personnel Records Center
  • Maintained by a reserve or National Guard component
  • Corrected without issuance of an updated DD Form 214

Depending on the record and service period, relevant sources may include:

  • National Personnel Records Center
  • National Archives
  • The veteran’s military branch
  • Official Military Personnel File
  • Defense Personnel Records Information Retrieval System
  • State National Guard records
  • Military pay records
  • Department of Veterans Affairs records
  • Prior legal or administrative proceedings
  • Freedom of Information Act requests
  • Privacy Act requests

Documents that may be needed include:

  • Every DD Form 214
  • DD Form 215
  • NGB Form 22
  • Enlistment and reenlistment contracts
  • Extension agreements
  • Separation orders
  • Evaluations and performance reports
  • Awards and deployment records
  • Retirement-points statements
  • Court-martial or NJP records
  • Administrative-separation packet
  • Medical or mental-health records
  • Prior correction-board decisions

Requesting “my DD Form 214” may not be enough when the legal issue involves multiple enlistments, service status, or the circumstances of separation.

Correcting an Incomplete or Inaccurate Military Record

A missing or incorrect record can prevent USCIS from finding that the veteran established qualifying service.

Potential problems include:

  • Incorrect service dates
  • Missing active-duty orders
  • Omitted reserve service
  • Wrong discharge characterization
  • Incorrect narrative reason
  • Incorrect separation code
  • Missing reenlistment period
  • Failure to reflect a board decision
  • Misconduct attributed to the wrong service period
  • Incorrect entry-level status
  • Missing medical evidence
  • Conflicting DD Forms 214

The potential remedies may include:

  • Administrative correction by the service department
  • DD Form 215
  • Discharge Review Board application
  • Army, Air Force, or Coast Guard BCMR petition
  • Navy or Marine Corps BCNR petition
  • Correction of National Guard records
  • A new service certification after correction

The requested correction should be designed around the immigration problem it must solve.

Read how NSLF handles military discharge upgrades for immigration and citizenship purposes.

Veterans Living Outside the United States

A veteran living abroad may still qualify for military naturalization.

INA § 329 does not impose the ordinary continuous-residence, physical-presence, or state-residence requirements. A qualifying wartime veteran may therefore retain eligibility despite living outside the United States.

INA § 328 cases may present different residence and timing questions, especially when the veteran files more than six months after separation.

Overseas veterans should also consider practical processing issues:

  • Where Form N-400 should be filed
  • Whether USCIS can conduct the interview abroad
  • Whether the applicant must travel to the United States
  • Where biometrics can be completed
  • Where the Oath of Allegiance can occur
  • Whether the applicant is currently serving or fully separated
  • Whether a USCIS international field office has jurisdiction
  • Whether military-installation processing is available
  • Whether the veteran can lawfully travel to the United States
  • Whether prior removal or inadmissibility issues create entry problems

Overseas naturalization arrangements available to current service members are not necessarily available in the same way to every separated veteran.

A veteran should not assume that INA § 329 eligibility automatically guarantees that every stage can be completed at a nearby embassy, consulate, or military installation.

Criminal History

Military service does not erase criminal history.

USCIS may examine:

  • Arrests
  • Charges
  • Convictions
  • Diversion programs
  • Deferred adjudications
  • Expunged or sealed cases
  • Controlled-substance offenses
  • Crimes involving moral turpitude
  • Aggravated felonies
  • Domestic violence
  • Probation or parole
  • Conduct that did not result in conviction

A veteran may have completed honorable military service and still be ineligible for naturalization because of a permanent statutory bar.

In other cases, the veteran may technically remain eligible but face substantial removal risk if Form N-400 brings the conviction to DHS’s attention.

The criminal disposition must be analyzed under federal immigration law—not merely under the law of the state where the case occurred.

Veterans with criminal records should review our page for military naturalization applicants with a criminal history.

Military Discipline

NJP, administrative action, or court-martial proceedings can affect:

  • Good moral character
  • Character of service
  • Discharge characterization
  • Form N-426
  • Credibility
  • Criminal-immigration consequences
  • Statements made on Form N-400

An Article 15 is not the same as a civilian conviction. A court-martial conviction may qualify as a conviction for immigration purposes. Administrative records can remain relevant even when no criminal conviction occurred.

Veterans with these records should read about military naturalization after NJP, administrative action, or court-martial.

False Claims and Enlistment Documents

Veterans may have made statements concerning citizenship or immigration status on:

  • Enlistment documents
  • Form I-9
  • Security-clearance forms
  • Passport applications
  • Voter-registration forms
  • Driver’s-license applications
  • Prior immigration applications
  • Statements to border or immigration officers

A false claim to U.S. citizenship can create severe consequences, including:

  • Inadmissibility
  • Deportability
  • Denial of naturalization
  • Removal proceedings
  • Good-moral-character problems
  • Criminal exposure

Military service does not automatically cure a false citizenship claim.

Before filing Form N-400, review NSLF’s guide to the immigration consequences of a false claim to U.S. citizenship.

Prior Removal Proceedings or Immigration Problems

Veterans sometimes assume that honorable service prevents removal. That is not always correct.

A veteran may have:

  • A prior order of removal
  • Pending removal proceedings
  • An outstanding Notice to Appear
  • Prior voluntary departure
  • Entry without inspection
  • Visa overstay
  • Fraud or misrepresentation
  • An abandoned adjustment application
  • A denied asylum case
  • Prior immigration detention
  • Unlawful reentry
  • A criminal ground of deportability
  • An invalid or questionable grant of permanent residence

INA § 329 contains significant exceptions to ordinary naturalization restrictions related to deportability and removal proceedings. The governing regulation states that a qualifying applicant may be naturalized even when an outstanding Notice to Appear exists.

That does not mean every veteran in removal proceedings qualifies.

The veteran must still establish substantive eligibility under INA § 329. If USCIS denies Form N-400, the veteran may remain in proceedings and exposed to the underlying removal grounds.

INA § 328 contains different provisions, including a limited exception for an applicant who is actually serving in the Armed Forces and satisfies the statutory requirements. A separated veteran should not assume that the current-service exception applies after leaving the military.

These cases require coordinated naturalization and removal-defense analysis.

Can Filing Form N-400 Put a Veteran at Risk?

Yes.

Military service does not make Form N-400 a risk-free filing.

USCIS will review:

  • Military history
  • Discharge records
  • Entry and admission history
  • Permanent-residence history
  • Criminal background
  • Prior immigration applications
  • Security checks
  • Enlistment documents
  • Statements made during the interview

If USCIS identifies a ground of deportability, fraud, false citizenship claim, or unlawful grant of permanent residence, it may:

  • Deny naturalization
  • Issue an RFE or NOID
  • Refer the case for investigation
  • Issue a Notice to Appear
  • Place the veteran in removal proceedings
  • Seek immigration detention in qualifying cases
  • Review previously granted benefits

The pre-filing analysis must determine both whether the veteran qualifies for citizenship and what could happen if USCIS disagrees.

Long Gaps Between Service and Filing

A long gap does not automatically eliminate eligibility.

Under INA § 329, a veteran may potentially apply decades after qualifying wartime service. The passage of time does not create a new service-duration requirement.

But a long gap may raise practical and legal questions:

  • Why did the veteran wait?
  • Are the records complete?
  • Did criminal or immigration problems arise after service?
  • Does the veteran still have evidence of enlistment location?
  • Were prior immigration applications filed?
  • Did the veteran travel or live abroad?
  • Was permanent residence ever abandoned?
  • Did USCIS previously deny naturalization?
  • Are removal proceedings pending?
  • Does the veteran have a current legal status?

Waiting itself is not necessarily disqualifying. What happened during the intervening years may be.

What If USCIS Issues an RFE or NOID?

An RFE or NOID may involve:

  • Missing service records
  • Form N-426 problems
  • Incomplete DD Form 214
  • Unclear service dates
  • Disputed discharge characterization
  • Multiple enlistments
  • Lack of proof of qualifying wartime service
  • Criminal history
  • Good moral character
  • Prior immigration violations
  • False citizenship claims
  • Questions about lawful permanent residence

A response should address the precise legal and factual deficiency. It should not simply argue that the veteran deserves citizenship because of military service.

NSLF represents veterans preparing military immigration RFE and NOID responses.

What If USCIS Denies the Application?

A veteran may generally request a hearing on a naturalization denial by filing Form N-336.

The filing deadline ordinarily is 30 calendar days after service of the denial, with additional time potentially applicable when USCIS served the decision by mail.

An N-336 case may challenge:

  • Incorrect interpretation of INA § 328 or § 329
  • Failure to recognize qualifying service
  • Incorrect service dates
  • Improper treatment of a discharge
  • Failure to consider corrected military records
  • Misapplication of the enlistment-location rule
  • Incorrect criminal or good-moral-character findings
  • Errors involving removal proceedings
  • Another factual or legal error

Read about NSLF’s representation for military naturalization denials and Form N-336 review hearings.

Documents Veterans Should Gather

If available, gather:

Military records

  • Every DD Form 214
  • DD Form 215
  • NGB Form 22
  • Separation orders
  • Enlistment and reenlistment contracts
  • Extension agreements
  • Official Military Personnel File
  • Evaluations and performance reports
  • Awards and deployment records
  • Retirement-points statements
  • Administrative-separation records
  • NJP or court-martial records
  • Prior DRB, BCMR, or BCNR decisions
  • Military medical and mental-health records

Immigration records

  • Green card
  • Form N-400
  • Adjustment-of-status application
  • Visa and consular filings
  • Prior asylum applications
  • Removal orders
  • Notices to Appear
  • Immigration-court records
  • USCIS RFEs, NOIDs, and denials
  • Prior statements concerning citizenship or status

Criminal records

  • Certified charging documents
  • Plea agreements
  • Judgments
  • Sentencing orders
  • Dismissal records
  • Probation documents
  • Expungement or vacatur orders

Do not delay seeking advice merely because some records are missing. Identifying which agencies hold the records may be part of the representation.

How NSLF Evaluates a Veteran Naturalization Case

Our review may include:

  1. Identifying every period of military service.
  2. Determining whether INA § 328 or § 329 applies.
  3. Evaluating the six-month INA § 328 filing window.
  4. Identifying service during designated hostilities.
  5. Reviewing discharge characterization.
  6. Examining multiple enlistments and conditional discharges.
  7. Locating missing military records.
  8. Determining whether Form N-426 or discharge documents are required.
  9. Evaluating residence and physical-presence requirements.
  10. Addressing overseas processing and travel logistics.
  11. Reviewing criminal and disciplinary history.
  12. Examining prior immigration filings and removal proceedings.
  13. Determining whether Form N-400 can be filed safely.
  14. Coordinating record-correction, RFE, NOID, or N-336 strategy.

The objective is not simply to find evidence that the client once served. It is to identify the strongest lawful path from that service to citizenship.

Why Choose National Security Law Firm?

Veteran naturalization cases can require immigration, military, criminal, and federal administrative-law experience.

Justin Price brings those perspectives together.

As a former Immigration Judge, he decided cases involving immigration status, removability, credibility, statutory interpretation, and eligibility for relief.

During more than 12 years as a DHS trial attorney, he represented the federal government in immigration court and learned how government attorneys investigate records, identify inconsistencies, and pursue removal cases.

As an Air Force JAG and military prosecutor, he worked with military personnel records, commanders, investigators, and disciplinary proceedings.

As a public defender, he represented individuals facing criminal accusations and government action.

NSLF’s military-law team also handles:

  • Discharge upgrades
  • BCMR and BCNR petitions
  • Military-record corrections
  • Administrative-separation records
  • Court-martial and NJP issues
  • DD Form 214 corrections

That combined experience allows NSLF to evaluate the veteran’s service, immigration history, and potential risks as one case—not separate problems assigned to lawyers who never coordinate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I become a citizen years after leaving the military?

Possibly. INA § 329 does not impose the same six-month filing window associated with the fullest benefits of INA § 328. A qualifying wartime veteran may apply years later if every requirement is satisfied.

What happens if I missed the six-month INA § 328 filing period?

Missing the six-month period does not necessarily end the case. You may need to qualify under ordinary naturalization rules, receive credit for recent honorable service under INA § 328(d), or determine whether INA § 329 applies.

Do veterans need Form N-426?

Separated veterans generally prove service and character of separation through official discharge and military records. Form N-426 is primarily used for current service members.

Can I qualify with a General discharge?

A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge may satisfy a requirement that separation be under honorable conditions. The complete service history and applicable naturalization provision still matter.

Can I qualify with an uncharacterized discharge?

Possibly. Under current USCIS policy, the discharge date is critical. A pre-August 1, 2024 uncharacterized discharge may satisfy the separation requirement, while one issued on or after that date does not.

Can an OTH discharge be upgraded for immigration purposes?

Potentially. A DRB, BCMR, or BCNR may have authority to correct an error or injustice. A successful upgrade does not automatically guarantee citizenship or erase the underlying conduct.

Can I apply from outside the United States?

Possibly. INA § 329 does not impose ordinary residence and physical-presence requirements. However, former service members may face interview, biometrics, oath, travel, and jurisdictional issues that differ from those facing current service members.

Does an old conviction prevent veteran naturalization?

It may. The effect depends on the offense, disposition, sentence, date, good-moral-character period, aggravated-felony rules, and whether the record creates removability.

Can a veteran in removal proceedings naturalize?

INA § 329 contains special exceptions that may permit an otherwise eligible applicant to naturalize despite an outstanding Notice to Appear. The applicant must still prove every substantive requirement, and denial may leave the veteran exposed to removal.

Does military service automatically cancel a removal order?

No. Military service does not automatically eliminate a removal order or every ground of deportability.

You Served the United States. Find Out Whether That Service Can Still Lead to Citizenship.

Your discharge date may be decades in the past. Your records may be incomplete. Your command may no longer exist. Your immigration history may be complicated.

None of that means your military service should be ignored.

INA §§ 328 and 329 provide real pathways for qualifying veterans—but the correct pathway depends on the details USCIS will examine: service dates, duty status, discharge characterization, entry history, permanent residence, criminal records, and prior immigration proceedings.

Let a former Immigration Judge, former DHS trial attorney, and Air Force JAG determine what your service still makes possible—and what must be resolved before you file.

Schedule your consultation with National Security Law Firm.

National Security Law Firm—It’s Our Turn to Fight for You.


Attorney and Editorial Information

Attorney author: Justin M. Price, National Security Law Firm Immigration Practice
Legal experience: Former U.S. Immigration Judge; former DHS trial attorney with more than 12 years of government experience; former Air Force Judge Advocate and military prosecutor; former Assistant Public Defender
Legal review date: August 24, 2026

This page provides general legal information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Eligibility depends on the applicant’s military status, service records, discharge, immigration history, criminal history, residence, and current law. No result is guaranteed.

Statutory and Regulatory Authority

  • Immigration and Nationality Act § 328, 8 U.S.C. § 1439
  • Immigration and Nationality Act § 329, 8 U.S.C. § 1440
  • Immigration and Nationality Act § 316, 8 U.S.C. § 1427
  • Immigration and Nationality Act § 318, 8 U.S.C. § 1429
  • Immigration and Nationality Act § 340, 8 U.S.C. § 1451
  • 8 C.F.R. Parts 328 and 329
  • Executive Order 13269, July 3, 2002

Legal Authorities and Official Resources