Guideline F Financial Concerns Threatening Your Security Clearance? Here’s How to Mitigate and Fight Back -

You never thought your credit card bills or student loans could put your security clearance at risk. Yet here you are – perhaps you’ve received a Statement of Reasons (SOR) citing “Guideline F: Financial Considerations,” or an investigator raised concerns about your debt and credit history. It’s a shocking and stressful situation. You might be lying awake wondering, “Is this the end of my career?” The idea of losing your clearance – and with it your job, income, and reputation – is terrifying. The good news: it doesn’t have to be. Financial issues are actually very common among clearance holders (in fact, they’re the single most frequent reason for clearance denials, accounting for roughly half of all cases) – and with the right strategy, they can often be mitigated and overcome. At National Security Law Firm (NSLF), we help clients in your exact position every day. We understand the panic you’re feeling, and we know how to fight back so you can resolve these concerns, protect your clearance, and keep your career on track.

This comprehensive guide will explain what Guideline F is, why you might be facing it, what can trigger these concerns, how to mitigate the allegations, and how our team can help you achieve the best possible outcome.

What is Guideline F: Financial Considerations?

Security clearance decisions boil down to one question: Can you be trusted with the nation’s secrets? Guideline F – Financial Considerations – is one of the 13 adjudicative guidelines used to evaluate that trust. The core concern is straightforward: If someone’s finances are in disarray, could that make them a security risk? The government worries that individuals with serious money problems might be tempted to commit espionage or other illegal acts for financial gain. As the official guideline states, failure to live within your means and meet your financial obligations may indicate poor judgment and unreliability, which in turn raises questions about your ability to safeguard classified information. An individual who is deep in debt or financially overextended is seen as being at greater risk of bribery or coercion by foreign agents or others seeking information. On the flip side, unexplained affluence – having more money or assets than you can account for – is also a red flag, since it might suggest undisclosed income from potentially illegal activities (yes, even spying for money).

In plain terms, Guideline F is about your financial trustworthiness. The government isn’t concerned with whether you’re rich or poor per se – it’s concerned with whether your financial situation might drive you to do something that betrays U.S. interests. History has shown that many Americans who betrayed their country did so for financial reasons (urgent need or personal greed) rather than ideology. So if you have significant unresolved debts or other serious financial problems, adjudicators will question whether you might be vulnerable to selling secrets or accepting bribes to get out of your hole. Conversely, if you’re suddenly flush with unexplained cash, they’ll question if you’ve already been engaged in something nefarious.

Now, before you panic: Guideline F issues do not mean you’re doomed or inherently untrustworthy. They mean your financial background has raised a question mark that needs to be answered. And answer it you can – the clearance process gives you a chance to mitigate (explain or resolve) these concerns. In fact, while financial considerations are a top cause of clearance troubles, they’re also highly solvable in many cases. Unlike, say, an act of treason, a lot of financial problems can be fixed or managed with responsible action. The key is understanding what triggers Guideline F concerns and how to demonstrate that your money issues won’t affect your loyalty or judgment. Let’s break down those triggers first.

What Can Trigger a Guideline F Security Concern?

Guideline F concerns boil down to money problems that call your reliability into question. According to the official adjudicative guidelines, examples of financial behaviors that raise red flags include:

Unpaid or Overdue Debts: A pattern of inability or unwillingness to satisfy debts – for example, having multiple accounts in collections, defaulting on loans, or consistently missing payments. Significant delinquent debt is by far the most common Guideline F issue; it signals you might be financially overextended and desperate. It’s not that any debt is disqualifying (many Americans carry some debt), but if you have a track record of not meeting your obligations or ignoring bills, it suggests unreliability.
History of Financial Irresponsibility: Related to the above, a history of not meeting financial obligations over time – repeatedly living beyond your means or overspending to the point of trouble. For instance, if your credit report shows chronic late payments, maxed-out credit cards, or excessive indebtedness relative to your income, adjudicators see a pattern of poor self-control. Consistent frivolous or reckless spending can flag you as someone who might not exercise good judgment in other areas either.
Deceptive or Illegal Financial Practices: Any financial misconduct is a huge red flag. This includes things like embezzlement, check fraud, credit card fraud, mortgage fraud, tax fraud, or any similar breaches of trust for financial gain. Such conduct not only creates potential vulnerability (e.g. could you be blackmailed over it?), but it directly reflects on your honesty. If you’ve been involved in fraudulent financial schemes, it’s going to take significant evidence to regain the government’s trust.
Failure to File or Pay Taxes: Not paying your taxes or failing to file tax returns is explicitly listed as a Guideline F concern. It might seem surprising, but unpaid tax debts or years of unfiled returns can indeed threaten your clearance. The government views willful tax delinquency as an unwillingness to follow laws and meet civic obligations – essentially, an integrity issue. (Plus, large tax debts contribute to financial pressure that bad actors could exploit.)
Unexplained Affluence: On the flip side of debt, too much money can also be a problem if its source is suspicious. Guideline F flags any affluence that cannot be explained by known legal income. In practice, this means if you have a lifestyle, assets, or bank account balances that far exceed what your job and salary would normally support, investigators will ask “Where is this money coming from?” If you can’t provide a legitimate explanation (gift, inheritance, lottery win, etc.), they’ll worry the funds could be from illicit activity (bribes, espionage payments, criminal enterprise, etc.).
Gambling Problems: Excessive gambling and the debts or behavior associated with it are specifically called out in Guideline F. Compulsive gambling can cause serious debt, of course – but even beyond the money lost, it signals potential issues with impulse control. It also opens the door to coercion (a loan shark or casino creditor leaning on you, for example). The guidelines mention things like borrowing money to fund gambling or pay gambling debts, and concealing gambling losses or related problems as disqualifying conditions. In short, if your financial troubles are tied to a gambling habit, that’s a double whammy: you have debt and an addiction that could cloud your judgment.

Those are the major categories, but really any significant financial irresponsibility can raise a Guideline F concern. For instance, even something like foreclosure or bankruptcy will trigger scrutiny – not because those are automatic clearance killers (they’re not), but because the circumstances behind them matter. A foreclosure stemming from a housing market crash is one thing; a foreclosure because you spent your paycheck at the casino is another. Context is everything. The government will dig into questions such as: How did you get into this financial situation? Was it due to bad luck or bad behavior? How have you handled it since? Sometimes a security clearance applicant gets hit with Guideline F simply due to a run of bad luck (say, unexpected medical bills and a layoff causing temporary defaults). Other times, it’s self-inflicted (say, racking up huge credit card bills on luxuries). Either way, you will have a chance to explain your side. Remember, an allegation is not a conclusion – but you must address it head-on.

It’s also worth noting that honesty is paramount throughout this process. One thing that can worsen a Guideline F case is if you tried to hide your financial issues. Failing to report required financial information (like a past bankruptcy or delinquency) on your SF-86, or lying about it to an investigator, will invite a separate Guideline E (Personal Conduct) concern on top of the financial one. Always disclose truthfully. The clearance adjudicators generally view the underlying debt itself as less alarming if you’ve been transparent and proactive about it. Hiding a problem, on the other hand, makes them wonder if you’ll also hide a security breach.

Now that we’ve covered what can land you in hot water under Guideline F, let’s turn to the hopeful part: how you can mitigate these concerns and prove you’re still trustworthy.

How to Mitigate Guideline F Security Clearance Concerns

If you’ve been flagged for financial issues, don’t lose hope. The adjudicative guidelines themselves list several mitigating factors – basically, conditions that, if true, can lessen the government’s concerns about your finances. In plain English, you need to show that whatever went wrong with your money does not reflect any lack of judgment, reliability, or loyalty on your part today. Here are the key ways to mitigate Guideline F concerns:

It’s (Mostly) in the Past: Demonstrate that the problematic behavior happened long ago, was infrequent, or was under unique circumstances such that it’s unlikely to recur. For example, if you had one bout of financial trouble years ago (say, a single debt default during the 2008 recession) and nothing since, emphasize that track record. If your issues were isolated and you’ve been stable ever since, the government can chalk it up as a one-time mistake rather than an ongoing risk.
Circumstances Beyond Your Control: One of the strongest mitigators is showing that the root cause of your financial problems was largely beyond your control – and that you acted as responsibly as possible under the circumstances. Life can throw curveballs: layoffs, medical emergencies, economic downturns, divorce, identity theft – these can wreak havoc on anyone’s finances. If something like that happened to you, explain it clearly. Provide documentation if possible (e.g. a letter showing you were laid off due to company downsizing, or medical bills from your emergency). Crucially, also show how you responded. Did you communicate with creditors, try to work out payment plans, cut expenses, or otherwise deal with it in good faith? If so, you’re meeting this mitigating condition. For instance, if you lost your job and fell behind on loans, but immediately sought new employment and negotiated with the lender, that’s acting responsibly given the hardship. The adjudicators are much more forgiving if uncontrollable bad luck was to blame, and you did what you could, versus if you simply blew your paycheck on a shopping spree. (Indeed, guidance indicates that if debt arose from conditions beyond one’s control and is being handled reasonably, the security significance is substantially reduced.)
Financial Counseling and Rehabilitation: If you’ve sought professional help to get your finances in order, that’s a positive sign. The guidelines specifically note that mitigation can include obtaining financial counseling from a legitimate source and showing clear indications the problem is being resolved or under control. Attending a nonprofit credit counseling program, working with a financial advisor, or even completing a personal finance course can all fall under this. It shows you’re taking the situation seriously and learning better habits. More importantly, be prepared to prove that your efforts are paying off – literally. Are you sticking to a budget now? Did your credit score improve? Have you paid off certain debts or at least stopped incurring new ones? Concrete evidence (like a letter from the counseling service, or updated financial statements) will reinforce that you have turned a corner.
Good-Faith Effort to Repay or Resolve Debts: Perhaps the most critical mitigation: Show that you are actively addressing your debts. The guideline explicitly says it’s mitigating if you’ve initiated and are adhering to a good-faith effort to repay overdue creditors or otherwise resolve your debts. In practice, this means you should gather proof of any payment plans, settlements, or steady payments you’ve been making. Even partial payments count – the key is that you’re not ignoring the debt; you’re tackling it. If a debt was large and you filed for bankruptcy as a responsible solution, that can be mitigating too. Many people fear that a bankruptcy will doom their clearance, but the reality is quite the opposite: both bankruptcy and credit counseling are recognized as positive steps to regain control of your finances. The government is less concerned that you had to file bankruptcy, and more concerned with why (was it reckless overspending or an unavoidable crisis?) and what you’ve done since (did you squander your second chance, or are you now financially stable?). So, don’t be afraid to mention if you filed Chapter 13 to systematically repay creditors, or Chapter 7 to discharge unpayable debts – if those actions were done in good faith to resolve your situation, they are mitigating, not condemning. Similarly, if you’ve paid off certain accounts, got current on your mortgage, or settled old collections, show evidence of those successes.
Legitimate Dispute of Debt: Sometimes a debt on your record isn’t even valid – or you have a reasonable basis to challenge it. The guidelines acknowledge mitigation if you have a legitimate reason to dispute a past-due debt and provide documented proof of your position, or evidence of actions to resolve it. For example, maybe you’re contending a fraudulent credit card account opened in your name, or you’re in an ongoing dispute with a lender about an amount owed. If so, you must thoroughly document it. Show copies of police reports (for identity theft), correspondence with the creditor or credit bureau, and any outcomes so far. If the debt is truly not your fault, get that in writing if possible (e.g. a letter from the creditor acknowledging an error). Additionally, if you’ve filed a formal dispute or appeal, mention that. The adjudicators won’t hold a genuinely contested debt against you if you can show you’re actively fighting it through proper channels.
Clean Source of Income (for Affluence Cases): If your issue is that you appear too wealthy, the mitigation is basically to prove the money came from a lawful, ethical source. This might involve providing bank records, bills of sale, or inheritance documents. For instance, if you have an unexplained large bank deposit, show that it was from selling your house, or cashing out a 401(k), or a gift from Grandma – anything that tracks back to a legal origin. The guideline specifically says it’s mitigating if the affluence resulted from a legal source of income. Don’t assume they’ll just know; you need to connect the dots. Sometimes a simple written explanation with supporting paperwork does the trick: e.g. “The $50,000 in my account was an inheritance; see attached will and deposit receipt.” Once it’s clear your Porsche was paid for by, say, an inheritance and not a foreign agent, the concern about unexplained wealth dissipates.
Tax Issues Resolved: If your concern involves taxes, mitigation will require that you’ve since filed any missing returns and arranged to pay what you owe. Show that you’re in compliance with an IRS payment plan if you can’t pay it all at once. Provide copies of filed returns, or letters from the IRS/state tax authority confirming your installment agreement and that you’re current on payments. Essentially, prove that you are no longer ignoring the tax man. This goes a long way. Adjudicators understand that people can fall behind on taxes for various reasons, but they need to see that once it was brought to your attention, you took active steps to fix it. If you’ve done so, and especially if some time has passed with you meeting your payment obligations, the tax issue can be largely mitigated.
Track Record of Stability and Honesty: Beyond the specific factors above, remember that clearance adjudications use the “whole-person” concept. This means they look at your entire character and history. You can bolster your case by highlighting evidence that you are a responsible, upstanding individual overall, despite the financial hiccups. For example, if you have years of honorable military or government service, performance awards, or other commendations, bring those up – they show that people have trusted you and you delivered. If you’ve served in positions handling sensitive information without incident, mention that too. Character references can also help: letters from supervisors, commanders, or colleagues attesting to your integrity, reliability, and how you handled your finances responsibly in the workplace (for instance, if you managed budgets or never had issues with travel card payments, etc.). Additionally, emphasize if you fully disclosed your financial issues from the start. As noted earlier, being honest on your SF-86 and during interviews is itself viewed favorably. If you listed every debt and explained them, point that out – it shows you weren’t trying to hide anything, which builds trust.

Hypothetical Scenario: Imagine a defense contractor, “Sarah,” who during the pandemic faced a perfect storm – her husband fell seriously ill (leading to massive medical bills) and she was briefly laid off due to budget cuts. In that period, the family’s finances nosedived: credit cards maxed out, a car was repossessed, and they fell behind on taxes. Sarah eventually found a new job and her husband recovered, but by then they had accumulated over $80,000 in debt. They filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy to reorganize and pay off creditors over time. Now, Sarah has received a Guideline F SOR highlighting the unpaid debts and the bankruptcy. This sounds dire, but Sarah has a strong case for mitigation. In her response, she provides hospital records and layoff notices to show the cause of her financial trouble was beyond her control (medical emergency and job loss) – not any personal irresponsibility. She documents that she acted responsibly under the circumstances: she got a new job as soon as possible, filed bankruptcy as a lawful way to handle the debt, and is making regular payments under the court-approved plan. She also includes proof that she went through financial counseling during the bankruptcy process (credit counseling is required in bankruptcies) and a letter from the bankruptcy trustee showing she’s in compliance. Additionally, Sarah gathers character letters from her manager and church leader noting her honesty and community involvement. With this evidence, Sarah can persuasively argue that her loyalty and judgment remain sound – she didn’t run up debt due to recklessness, and once hardship hit, she did everything one could do to resolve it. Outcome: The adjudicators, seeing the strong mitigating factors (beyond control circumstances, good-faith debt resolution, counseling, etc.), are likely to conclude that Sarah’s financial issues do not indicate any security risk going forward. Her clearance is continued.

The takeaway from Sarah’s story (which mirrors many real cases) is that Guideline F concerns can be overcome with a thorough, well-documented response. You need to tell your story with facts: explain why the debts or issues arose, show what you’ve proactively done to fix or manage them, and provide evidence for every claim. When the government sees that your financial house is back in order – or well on its way there – and that you’ve learned from past mistakes, their fears about your vulnerability greatly diminish. Even if you made some errors in judgment with money, demonstrating a sustained change in behavior (like a year or two of on-time payments and no new problems) can tip the scales in your favor. Remember, the clearance process is not about punishing past mistakes; it’s about forecasting future risk. If you can convince them that your finances are now stable and not a future risk factor, you can keep your clearance.

Given what’s at stake – your clearance, career, and reputation – it’s often wise to get experienced help in preparing your response. Financial mitigation can involve compiling a lot of documentation and crafting a compelling narrative. At NSLF, we specialize in doing exactly that for our clients. We know which mitigating factors apply and how to effectively present them. We’ve helped many individuals with serious Guideline F issues (even bankruptcies, big tax debts, and multiple collections) ultimately prevail and retain their clearances.

Our Pricing and Flexible Financing Options

We believe everyone should have access to top-notch legal help when their career is on the line, so we keep our pricing transparent and fair. In fact, we publish flat fees for all common security clearance services:

SF-86 Review: $950
LOI (Letter of Interrogatory) Response: $3,500
SOR (Statement of Reasons) Response: $5,000 (we’ll credit $3,000 if you already paid for an LOI response)
Formal Hearing Representation: $7,500 (includes attorney travel)

We also offer legal financing through Pay Later by Affirm, allowing you to break payments into 3, 6, 12, or 24 monthly plans. It’s fast and easy to check your options, and it won’t affect your credit score to explore this route. This means you can get the legal assistance you need right away, and pay over time in a way that fits your budget. We partnered with Affirm because we don’t want financial constraints to stop you from getting quality defense – especially not when financial issues are exactly what needs solving! Many of our Guideline F clients find this helpful: you can start protecting your clearance immediately, without worrying that hiring an attorney will itself break the bank.

Why Choose National Security Law Firm?

When it comes to defending your security clearance, you want the best team in your corner. Guideline F cases can be intricate – they involve financial records, legal nuances (bankruptcies, tax law, etc.), and often require persuasive storytelling to humanize the situation. Here’s why we’re uniquely qualified to help you:

We are clearance insiders. Our team includes former security clearance adjudicators, DOHA government attorneys, ex-JAG military officers, and even a former Administrative Judge who decided clearance cases. In short, we’ve worked inside the clearance system – the very agencies and boards that will review your case. We know exactly how the process works from the government’s perspective. This insider knowledge lets us anticipate the arguments and concerns the government will have, and address them proactively. Few firms can match our depth of specialized experience in the national security arena.
Deep expertise in Guideline F cases. Guideline F is one of the most common causes of clearance denials – but it’s also one of the most winnable with the right strategy, as we’ve discussed. Our attorneys have successfully handled countless financial cases. We understand how to dig through credit reports, how to present bankruptcy information in a favorable light, and how to emphasize the mitigating aspects of what might otherwise look bad. We also have relationships with trusted financial consultants and forensic accountants who can assist in analyzing complex cases (for example, if you need an expert opinion that your debt-to-income ratio is now manageable, or testimony on economic conditions that contributed to your situation). We bring every tool to bear to strengthen your case.
Team strategy, not just one lawyer. At NSLF, you get a team, not a solo practitioner. We regularly convene our internal Attorney Review Board – a panel of multiple senior attorneys – to brainstorm the best defense strategies for tough cases. That means even if one attorney is your primary counsel, several minds will be collaborating on your case behind the scenes. For example, in a Guideline F matter we might have one lawyer focusing on the legal brief, another reviewing the financial documents for any inconsistencies, and yet another conducting a moot Q&A prep with you for potential hearing questions. This team-based approach ensures no stone is left unturned. It’s like having a squad of clearance experts all working together to craft the strongest possible response for you.
We’ve been in your shoes. Most of our attorneys has held a security clearance, so we personally understand what you’re going through. We know that your clearance isn’t just paperwork – it’s your livelihood. Some of us have even faced periodic re-investigations and the stress that comes with them. This makes us extra passionate about helping our clients. You’re not just case number XYZ to us; we get the stakes and the anxiety. We treat your case with the same urgency and care that we would want if our own careers hung in the balance. We also take pride in our firm being veteran-owned and operated – we’ve served, and now it’s our turn to serve you.
Resources to strengthen your case. Financial cases sometimes benefit from supplementary evidence beyond just your word. We maintain a network of trusted experts – from psychologists (to attest to your trustworthiness or explain a gambling addiction recovery, for instance) to polygraph examiners (in rare cases) to the financial experts mentioned earlier. If needed, we can bring in these professionals to provide supporting reports or testimony. For instance, if you had a gambling issue that’s now under control, a counselor’s evaluation could reinforce that. Or if you had a medical bankruptcy, a doctor’s letter might confirm the severity of the situation that led to it. We know how to integrate such evidence to bolster your mitigation.
Proven results and stellar reputation. Our track record speaks for itself. We’ve helped hundreds of clients resolve clearance issues and move forward in their careers. Check out our 4.9-star Google Reviews from past clients – these are real people we guided to successful outcomes when everything was on the line for them. We are proud that many clients say we gave them their life back by saving their clearance. While every case is unique (and past results don’t guarantee future outcomes), our experience, knowledge, and dedication consistently translate into wins in even challenging cases. We also frequently write and speak on security clearance matters (you might have seen NSLF attorneys quoted in the news or presenting at security conferences), which keeps us at the forefront of this field.

In short, National Security Law Firm is the go-to firm for security clearance defense because we combine insider expertise, a team approach, and an unwavering commitment to our clients. When you hire us, you’re arming yourself with an elite unit of national security law specialists who will fight tooth and nail to protect your clearance.

Additional Resources

Worried about other issues that could affect your clearance? We’ve got you covered. Be sure to visit our Security Clearance Resource Center page on our website for a wealth of helpful resources. There, you can find articles on common mistakes that lead to clearance denial, guides on how to ace your security clearance interview, and deep dives into defenses for every type of security concern (from Guideline A through Guideline M). It’s essentially a one-stop hub for security clearance knowledge – empowering you with insight to avoid pitfalls and strengthen your position. For example, if you’re also worried about a foreign relative (Guideline B) or past drug use (Guideline H), you’ll find specific tips on mitigating those as well. We believe in not only helping our clients react to issues, but also proactively educating clearance holders so they can prevent problems before they start.

We continually update our Resource Center with new content (the security clearance world is always evolving – e.g. policy changes, new precedents, etc.), so it’s a good page to bookmark. And of course, if you prefer personalized guidance, you can always reach out to us directly.

You Have One Shot to Get This Right — Let’s Make It Count

Financial concerns are high stakes – your clearance, career, and reputation hang in the balance. But remember: you will get an opportunity to tell your side of the story and defend yourself. It’s crucial to make that one chance count. In most cases, you only get one shot at a written response to an SOR, and if needed, one shot at a hearing. This isn’t something to approach casually or hope for the best. As the saying goes, “Proper preparation prevents poor performance.” Now is the time to be proactive and strategic.

Don’t risk your future by going it alone or waiting too long. Every day you wait to address a Guideline F issue is another day interest and penalties might be accruing, and another day investigators might view as inaction. More importantly, if you delay, you might bump up against procedural deadlines – DOHA typically gives you only 20 days to respond to an SOR (though extensions can be requested in some cases). The clock starts ticking the moment you receive that notice. If you’ve received a Letter of Interrogatory or SOR, the countdown to protect your clearance has begun. Acting swiftly can make all the difference in the outcome. Evidence can go stale, and memories fade – for example, you might need a letter from a former landlord about why you broke a lease that led to a collection; if you wait months, they might be less inclined or harder to find. On the other hand, acting quickly and deliberately can turn a weak case into a strong one.

This is not the time to “wait and see” or attempt a DIY fix if you’re unsure. Guideline F cases involve nuanced judgment calls about what is an acceptable level of debt or what constitutes responsible action. It’s easy to get tripped up by something as simple as phrasing your explanation the wrong way, or omitting a key document. You need an elite legal team with insider knowledge, financial savvy, and a battle-tested strategy to guide you. We have your six.

When you engage NSLF, we move quickly to take the pressure off your shoulders and start building your defense. From the very first free consultation, we’ll listen to your story and give you clear guidance on what to do (and what not to do) to maximize your chances. You’ll walk away from that initial call with an action plan and a sense of relief. Our clients often tell us that after hiring us, they felt a huge weight lifted – instead of constantly worrying about their case, they could focus on their job and family while we handled the heavy lifting. You deserve that peace of mind. You’ve worked hard for your clearance and your career; let us work hard to protect it.

✅ We’ll tell you exactly what evidence to gather and which arguments to make to address each Guideline F concern head-on. Whether it’s pulling your latest credit report, obtaining payoff letters from creditors, or getting statements from people who can corroborate your mitigation, we will map it out for you step by step.

✅ We’ll craft a tailored legal strategy grounded in our real-world national security experience to rebut the allegations. No generic templates – your case will get a custom-built response that highlights all the favorable facts and mitigators applicable. If there are weaknesses in the government’s case, we’ll spot them and exploit them. If there are sympathetic aspects to your story, we’ll emphasize them.

✅ We’ll fight to preserve your clearance, your career, and your reputation – so you can move forward with confidence. Our job isn’t done until we’ve done everything possible to secure the best outcome, whether that’s a clearance granted/maintained or guiding you through an appeal.

The sooner you act, the better your chances of success. Don’t lose another night’s sleep worrying about this. Take control of the situation now – it’s free and easy to get started. Simply book a consultation with our team today. It’s confidential, no-pressure, and will give you a clear roadmap for the path forward. We’ll review your specific facts and candidly assess how to tackle them. Even if you ultimately decide to handle it on your own, you’ll have benefited from expert input. But if you do choose to have us by your side, you can rest easy knowing you have the premier security clearance defense firm fighting for you.

Go to sleep tonight knowing that your case is in good hands. You’ve defended your country – now let us fight for you.

National Security Law Firm: It’s Our Turn to Fight for You.