Free Yourself from the Burden of an Unjust Titling with NSLF’s Help

Have you been unfairly titled, and is it holding you back? At National Security Law Firm (NSLF), we have successfully helped many individuals remove or expunge titling decisions that weighed heavily on their careers and personal lives. Imagine moving forward without this cloud over your future—no more missed promotions, job offers, or security clearance issues. With one quick call to us, we’ll let you know whether you are a good candidate for titling and, if so, we’ll map out a quick, affordable plan to clear your name while you rest easy knowing we’ll handle everything.

Navigating the Complexities of Military Titling Removal/Expungement: A Comprehensive Guide

The titling process can lead to significant and often unjust consequences. At NSLF, we understand the weight it carries. In this guide, we explain what titling is, how it can impact you, and how you can challenge unjust titling decisions. Our team is here to guide you through the complexities, and we’re committed to helping you protect your future. Let us take the burden off your shoulders.

For more detailed insights on titling removal, be sure to explore our related blog posts on this subject, including:

Titling vs. Indexing

Titling is an investigative process used by military law enforcement to document individuals who are subjects of a criminal investigation. It indicates that a person was the focus of an investigation, not that they were found guilty or charged. Being titled in the military is as simple as being named as the “subject” of a CID (Criminal Investigation Division) or NCIS (Naval Criminal Investigative Service) report of investigation. To title someone, the investigator on the case only needs to develop “credible information” that the service member committed a criminal offense. Credible information can be as minimal as an alleged victim’s first statement to military police. Titling is not a legal decision; it is strictly investigative. Therefore, being titled means merely being the subject of an investigation.

Indexing, on the other hand, ensures that this information is stored in the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII) — a criminal database — for future retrieval. While titling is specific to the investigation, indexing makes the information accessible for background checks and other security or law enforcement purposes.

Titling and Indexing are two related but distinct processes used by the Department of Defense (DoD) law enforcement agencies (LEAs).

  • Titling: This occurs when a covered person (such as a service member) is named as a subject in a DoD LEA investigative report based on credible information. The purpose is to document their involvement in the investigation for accuracy.
  • Indexing: Once titled, their information is indexed in the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII), allowing it to be retrieved by law enforcement or for security purposes in the future. Indexing ensures the report is accessible for background checks, security clearance investigations, or further legal inquiries.

In short, titling is the identification of a person in an investigative report, while indexing ensures the report is stored and retrievable for future use.

Titling vs. Probable Cause

The difference between titling and probable cause standards lies in their purpose and the level of evidence required.

Titling Standard: In military investigations, titling occurs when a person is named as the subject of a criminal investigation. The investigator needs only credible information—a very low standard. It simply means there’s reason to believe that the person committed a crime, even without concrete proof. This step is strictly administrative and does not imply guilt.

Probable Cause Standard: Probable cause, on the other hand, is a higher threshold used in deciding whether to charge someone with a crime or take judicial action. Probable cause exists when the available facts and evidence would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime was committed and the accused likely committed it. This is the standard required for arrests, searches, or formal charges.

Involvement:

  • Titling occurs early in the investigative process, based on initial evidence or allegations, and may happen even if no charges are filed later.
  • Probable Cause comes into play when an investigation concludes that there is sufficient evidence to take further legal or judicial action, such as arrest or prosecution.

Legal Authority

DoD Instruction 5505.07, Titling and Indexing in Criminal Investigations, establishes the DoD’s policies and procedures for titling and indexing subjects of criminal investigations. This policy requires the titling and indexing of any service member under criminal investigation “as soon as the investigation determines there is credible information that the subject committed a criminal offense.” This is an incredibly low standard. Once the subject of a criminal investigation has been indexed in the federal law enforcement database (DCII), “the information will remain in the DCII, even if the subject is found not guilty of the offense under investigation” unless the DoD LEA head or designated
expungement official grants expungement.

Effect of Being Titled

While the burden to title someone is quite low, the burden it places on the person titled can be heavy. As discussed above, when a service member is titled, the report of investigation is indexed in the Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII). Once a person is titled and indexed, the record will be on file and accessible for up to 40 years, unless it is removed or expunged.

When a person is titled, the record can be (and often is) accessed during background checks for employment and education applications. In the civilian world, this record can be likened to an arrest without further prosecution. It will often require explanation and can be a determining factor for employers, educational institutions, and other areas where background checks are required.

As discussed above, titling is an administrative decision, not a legal or judicial one. It means that a person is named as a subject in a report based on credible information, but it does not imply guilt or innocence. It’s purely an administrative procedure, designed to ensure efficiency and accuracy in investigations.

However, when titling decisions are indexed in systems like the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII) and appear in background checks, they are very often misunderstood. Many people don’t understand what a titling notation is and incorrectly assume that being titled equates to guilt. Moreover, even when people properly understand that titling isn’t a legal determination, the mere existence of a report can create a negative perception, leading to misunderstandings or assumptions of guilt, even when none exists. This can negatively affect security clearances, job offers, and professional opportunities, creating reputational harm that is difficult to undo, even if the individual is cleared of wrongdoing. Thus, misinterpretation of titling, despite it being non-judicial, can have long-lasting effects on a person’s career and reputation.

At National Security Law Firm, we specialize in helping clients understand, challenge, and remove inappropriate titling or indexing from their records to safeguard their futures. If your name has been improperly titled or indexed, we can help you navigate the complex removal process and mitigate the harm caused.

Problems or Errors in Titling

Errors and issues in the titling process can and do occur, often leading to unjust consequences for service members. Some common problems include:

  • Inaccurate reporting: A common issue arises when a service member is charged with multiple offenses, but ultimately receives an Article 15 for a lesser, reduced offense. However, on background checks, it may inaccurately appear as though they were punished for the more serious offenses. This discrepancy can unfairly damage the service member’s reputation, hinder career opportunities, and impact security clearance eligibility. Correcting such errors requires appealing to have the titling and records accurately reflect the actual offense for which they were disciplined.
  • Inaccurate or Incomplete Investigations: In some cases, individuals may be titled based on incomplete or inaccurate investigations, leading to wrongful documentation.
  • Lack of Notification: Service members are not always notified that they have been titled, leaving them unaware of the potential implications on their careers.
  • Administrative Oversights: Errors in documentation or administrative processes can result in incorrect or unjust titling.
  • Misinterpretation of Evidence: Misinterpretation or misrepresentation of evidence during the investigation can lead to wrongful titling.

Removing or Expunging a Titling Decision

When a person has been indexed after titling, there are ways to attack the record and expunge or delete the titling decision. For example, titling information indexed in the DCII can be expunged or corrected if the titling resulted from mistaken identity or if no credible information existed at the time the titling decision was made.

It’s easy to find information online suggesting that removing a titling decision is nearly impossible, but much of that is outdated or inaccurate. As explained further below, the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) expanded and streamlined the process, providing more opportunities for titling removal. With these updates, service members now have clearer avenues to challenge unjust titling decisions. However, navigating this process still requires in-depth legal expertise. Consulting an attorney is crucial, as they can identify procedural errors and build a strategic case, reviewing evidence and investigative files to give you the best chance of success.

One quick call to us at NSLF is all it takes to begin the process of removing or correcting your titling decision—leaving you free to focus on your career and future.

New Rules for the Removal of Titling PII

The 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was passed by the 116th Congress of the United States in 2020. One notable change was made in Section 545: Removal of Personally Identifying and Other Information of Certain Persons From Investigative Reports, the Department of Defense Central Index of Investigations, and Other Records and Databases. This provision allows Soldiers to challenge a titling by submitting relevant documents and evidence to request a correction, expungement, or removal of personally identifying information from records related to law enforcement or criminal investigations.

The 2021 NDAA now includes certain information that was previously not considered in such requests. When a Soldier wishes to challenge a titling, they can send their request and supporting documents to the Army Crime Records Center (CRC), which oversees crime records for the entire Army and is responsible for approving these requests.

The CRC may grant a correction, expungement, or removal under three circumstances:

(1) lack of probable cause or insufficient evidence to prove the crime occurred;

(2) lack of probable cause or insufficient evidence to prove the Soldier was responsible for the crime; or

(3) any other reason specified by the Secretary of Defense.

The CRC takes into account various factors when making their decision, as outlined in the 2021 NDAA as follows:

(1) The extent or lack of corroborating evidence against the covered person with respect to the offense.

(2) Whether adverse administrative, disciplinary, judicial, or other such action was initiated against the covered person for the offense.

(3) The type, nature, and outcome of any adverse administrative, disciplinary, judicial, or other such action taken against the covered person for the offense.

One notable change is that they now consider whether any adverse action was taken against the Soldier in question, as well as the outcome of that action. This is beneficial for Soldiers who are titled but have the charges dropped, as the CRC can take into account the lack of adverse action and use it as evidence to remove the titling.

This new language provides a chance for Soldiers who have been cleared of any wrongdoing to fully move on from the incident without a negative mark on their record. The previous guidelines did not allow this, as they stated that a titling could not be removed even if the Soldier was not charged or punished — so long as “credible information” existed that they committed the offense at the time of the initial titling. This change in language allows for a fairer and more just process for Soldiers who have been cleared of any suspicion.

How to Correct Titling Errors

Correcting a titling error or seeking removal of a title can be a complex and challenging process. However, it is possible with the right approach and legal support. Here are the steps involved:

  1. Review the Investigation Report: Obtain a copy of the investigation report to understand the basis for the titling decision. Review the report for any inaccuracies, inconsistencies, or procedural errors.
  2. Gather Evidence: Collect any evidence that can refute the basis for the titling, such as witness statements, documents, or expert opinions. Demonstrate any procedural errors or violations of rights during the investigation process.
  3. File a Petition for Removal: Submit a formal petition to the appropriate military authority requesting the removal of the title. Clearly outline the reasons for the request, supported by evidence and legal arguments.
  4. Seek Legal Assistance: Engage the services of a military law attorney who specializes in titling issues. An experienced attorney can help navigate the complex legal landscape and advocate on your behalf.
  5. Follow Up: Stay in regular contact with the authorities handling your petition to ensure it is being processed. Be prepared to provide additional information or clarification if requested.

How Negative Titling Can Affect You and Why You Should Correct It

Impact of Negative Titling on Career and Personal Life – Being listed in the Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII) and the U.S. Army Crime Records Center (CRC) can have extensive and long-lasting implications. A “CID titling” can remain on a Soldier’s record for up to forty years. During this time, any criminal records checks, background checks, or name checks performed by law enforcement or other agencies will reveal the Soldier’s “titled” status. This may prompt the agency to request a copy of the Law Enforcement Report (LER) or Report of Investigation (ROI) stored in the CRC. The presence of a “CID titling” in these reports can trigger numerous collateral consequences with broad and significant impacts.

The effects of being “titled” and subsequently indexed in military criminal records databases are far-reaching. Negative outcomes may include the loss of a security clearance, separation from military service, reduced civilian job opportunities, unfavorable military personnel decisions, and restricted military job prospects. The persistent presence of a “titling” in these databases magnifies its potential impact, adversely affecting a Soldier’s career and personal life across multiple domains.

Here are some of the key ways in which negative titling can affect you:

  1. Career Advancement:
    • Promotion Opportunities: Titling can negatively impact your promotion opportunities. When going up for promotion, the titling will appear on your record, which can be a red flag to promotion boards. Even if you have not been charged or found guilty, the presence of a titling can suggest a history of misconduct, reducing your chances of promotion.
    • Separation from Service: After two unsuccessful attempts at promotion due to a negative titling, you could face separation from the military. This not only ends your military career but also impacts your future employment opportunities.
  2. Security Clearances:
    • Security Risks: Titling can affect your ability to obtain or maintain a security clearance. The presence of a titling in your record can raise concerns about your reliability and trustworthiness, leading to the denial or revocation of your clearance. Without a security clearance, you may be unable to perform your duties or qualify for certain positions within the military.
    • Limited Job Opportunities: Many military and civilian positions require security clearances. A negative titling can limit your job opportunities both within the military and in the civilian sector, particularly in fields requiring access to classified information.
  3. Reputation and Stigma:
    • Professional Reputation: A titling can tarnish your professional reputation within the military community. Colleagues and superiors may view you with suspicion, even if no charges were filed or you were found not guilty. This can affect your relationships and standing within your unit.
    • Personal Stigma: Beyond your professional life, being titled can carry a personal stigma. Friends, family, and community members may view you differently, impacting your personal relationships and social interactions.
  4. Post-Military Career:
    • Federal Employment: If you apply for a federal government position after your military career, the titling will still show up in your record. This can influence hiring decisions and potentially disqualify you from certain jobs.
    • Private Sector Impact: Many private sector employers conduct thorough background checks. The presence of a titling can be viewed similarly to an arrest record, raising questions about your past and impacting your employability.

Why You Should Correct a Negative Titling

Given the substantial impact a negative titling can have on your career and personal life, it is crucial to seek correction or removal of any unjust titling. Here’s why you should take action:

  1. Protect Your Career:
    • Ensure Fair Promotion Consideration: Correcting a negative titling ensures that your promotion opportunities are not unfairly hindered. By clearing your record, you allow promotion boards to assess your qualifications based on merit rather than a tainted record.
    • Maintain Security Clearance: Addressing and correcting titling can help maintain your security clearance, which is essential for many military roles and future civilian jobs.
  2. Preserve Your Reputation:
    • Professional Integrity: Clearing a negative titling helps preserve your professional reputation. It ensures that your colleagues and superiors view you based on your performance and conduct, not on an unfounded investigation.
    • Personal Peace of Mind: Correcting a titling provides peace of mind, knowing that your personal and professional reputation is not marred by an inaccurate or unjust record.
  3. Enhance Post-Military Opportunities:
    • Federal and Civilian Employment: Removing a negative titling from your record enhances your eligibility for federal employment and increases your attractiveness to private sector employers. It ensures that background checks reflect your true history, free from unjust implications.
  4. Fairness and Justice:
    • Correct Inaccuracies: Ensuring that your record accurately reflects your conduct is a matter of fairness and justice. If you were titled without credible evidence or due to errors, it is your right to seek correction and clear your name.

FAQs About Titling

1. What is a titling/indexing decision, and how does it impact me?

A titling/indexing decision occurs when your name is placed in a law enforcement database, such as the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII), as part of an investigation. This doesn’t mean you’ve been charged with a crime, but it signifies that you were the subject of a criminal investigation. Although it is not a formal accusation, a titling decision can negatively impact your military career, future employment, and security clearance eligibility.

2. How can I appeal, expunge, or remove a titling decision?

To appeal a titling decision, you must first submit a request to the law enforcement agency or military authority that issued the decision. The process generally involves presenting new or additional evidence that was not considered during the original investigation. In most cases, a legal professional can assist you in drafting a compelling appeal that challenges the validity of the evidence or points to procedural errors. If necessary, your appeal can be escalated to higher authorities within the military justice system for review.

3. What is the difference between a titling decision and a finding of probable cause?

A titling decision is an administrative action that simply places your name in an investigative database, while a probable cause finding is a legal determination that there is enough evidence to support the belief that a crime was committed and that you were involved. A probable cause finding can lead to formal charges or legal proceedings, whereas a titling decision may not necessarily result in formal legal action. However, both can have long-term consequences for your security clearance, military career, and employment prospects.

4. Can a titling decision or probable cause finding be removed from my record?

Yes, both titling decisions and probable cause findings can potentially be removed from your record, but the process is complex. Removal often involves appealing to the relevant authority, providing new evidence, or showing that the original decision was made based on incomplete or faulty information. Successful removal can help protect your future career and security clearance, but the success rate depends on the specifics of your case. Our team has extensive experience navigating these types of appeals and can help you pursue the removal of these decisions from your record.

5. What are the consequences of having a titling decision on my record?

Having a titling decision on your record can significantly impact your military career, as it may prevent you from being promoted or receiving certain assignments. Additionally, it can affect your security clearance, making it difficult for you to obtain or maintain positions that require high levels of trust or access to classified information. Even if no formal charges are brought against you, the titling decision can raise red flags with future employers, particularly in sensitive industries.

6. How long does it take to appeal a titling decision or probable cause finding?

On average, the titling removal process can take anywhere from 6 months to 2 years, depending on the complexity of the case and the backlog of the military board handling the appeal. It’s important to start early and remain persistent in following up on your case.

For a more in-depth analysis of the timeline for a titling expungement, read our blog post discussing How Long Titling Removal /Expungement Takes.

7. What happens if my request is denied?

If your request for titling removal is denied, you may still have options. In some cases, you can escalate the appeal to a higher authority or explore additional legal remedies such as judicial review. An attorney can help you evaluate the reasons for the denial and develop a strategy for continuing to challenge the decision. In certain situations, pursuing a new appeal with updated evidence or addressing procedural errors in the initial appeal can lead to a more favorable outcome.

8. Can I submit new evidence as part of my request?

Yes, submitting new evidence is often a key part of expunging a titling decision. This could include witness statements, documents that were not available during the initial investigation, or expert testimony that challenges the conclusions of the investigators. Presenting new and compelling evidence can significantly increase the chances of a successful appeal, especially if it directly refutes the basis of the original decision.

9. How likely is it that my titling decision will be overturned?

If you’re wondering about the likelihood of having your titling decision overturned, it’s important to understand that it varies based on the specifics of your case. While titling removals have historically been challenging, recent changes under the 2021 NDAA have created new opportunities for removal. If you were never formally charged with an offense, or charges were dismissed, you may have a strong case for removal. Even in plea situations, we may challenge the underlying probable cause or procedural issues. Contact us at NSLF for a free consultation to evaluate your case and discuss the next steps. We will review the facts thoroughly and identify any errors or overlooked factors to improve your chances of success. Let us take on the hard work while you rest easy, knowing your case is in expert hands.

Again, if you’re unsure whether your titling decision can be overturned, don’t assume you have a bad case—reach out to us for a free consultation. Our consultation process is quick and easy, so let us evaluate your case and provide a clear action plan.

10. What kind of legal representation do I need to remove or appeal a titling decision?

To successfully challenge a titling decision or probable cause finding, you need a legal team that understands the complexities of military and federal law, particularly when it comes to criminal investigations. At National Security Law Firm, we are former JAG officers with deep experience in Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) cases and military criminal investigations. Civilian attorneys may lack the necessary understanding of these specialized military procedures. Our team has the insider knowledge and experience needed to navigate these complex cases effectively. Don’t leave your case in the hands of a civilian lawyer—trust those who know the system.

11. Can “CID Titling” Lead to Security Clearance Revocation? 

The addition of “CID titling” can have severe ramifications for active duty Soldiers or those in the Reserves, potentially resulting in the withdrawal or refusal of their security clearance. This could significantly impede their ability to carry out their duties and put their ongoing service at risk. In such cases, the Soldier’s clearance will be reviewed by the Department of Army’s Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB), which holds the power to determine if any negative information, including CID titling, should be included in their official personnel files. If such detrimental information is incorporated into the Soldier’s performance section of the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), it can have far-reaching consequences. This can hinder promotions, affect assignments, limit opportunities for further education, and even result in a potential elimination board. Therefore, the loss of a security clearance has implications beyond immediate effects and can greatly impact the Soldier’s career advancement and professional growth.

12. Does removing or expunging a titling decision affect my current or future security clearances?

Titling decisions can impact your security clearance, particularly if the decision relates to allegations of misconduct, dishonesty, or other issues that may raise concerns about your trustworthiness. However, a successful expungement can remove these red flags from your record and improve your chances of maintaining or obtaining clearance in the future. Our attorneys will help you navigate the appeal process while also advising you on how to mitigate any potential impacts on your security clearance.

13. Can “CID Titling” Be Used to Involuntarily Separate a Soldier?

Although a “CID titling” action alone is not likely to be the sole reason for a Soldier’s involuntary separation, the Department of the Army’s Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) will assess whether any unfavorable information requested by a commander or agency without filing authority should be recorded in the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). They will also determine whether it should be placed in the performance section or the restricted portion. As per AR 190–45 (Law Enforcement Reporting), AR 195–2 (Criminal Investigation Activities), and chapter 5 of AR 600–37 (Unfavorable Information), law enforcement agencies such as CID will provide input to the DASEB when unfavorable information is provided for criminal justice action against an individual.

If the Law Enforcement Report (LER) or Report of Investigation (ROI) containing the “CID titling” decision is included in the AMHRR, it could result in an Administrative Separation Board for enlisted Soldiers or a Board of Inquiry for officers, depending on the additional information in the LER/ROI. According to paragraph 2-2(c)(1) of AR 600-37, the DASEB may also suggest potential separation or elimination actions to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) based on information submitted for inclusion in the AMHRR.

14. What are my rights if I believe the titling decision or probable cause finding was unjust?

If you believe that a titling decision or probable cause finding was made in error or was based on incomplete or inaccurate information, you have the right to challenge it. This could involve filing a request for correction, removal, or expungement, requesting a review of the decision, or submitting new evidence to refute the findings. At National Security Law Firm, we are committed to defending your rights and will work tirelessly to ensure that any unjust decisions are overturned.

15. Can a “CID Titling” Decision Be Used by Future Employers to Deny Employment? 

Soldiers applying for certain jobs, especially federal positions, can access both the DCII and the U.S. Army CRC. This is similar to an arrest record in that there may be enough evidence to arrest someone, but not enough to move forward with a trial. Even without a conviction, a criminal history check may uncover an arrest that the individual must clarify to a potential employer. Both government and civilian employers often conduct background checks that include querying the Army criminal records indexes (DCII and USACRC) before and after employment, which notes “CID titling.” This can present significant obstacles in obtaining employment, requiring individuals to provide explanations and seek exemptions based on their records.

16. Can “CID Titling” Affect Military Personnel Decisions and Job Opportunities? 

A “CID titling” determination, in conjunction with an initial Law Enforcement Report (LER) or Report of Investigation (ROI) stored in the database of the U.S. Army Crime Records Center (CRC), can have significant ramifications for a Soldier’s career. Based on this information, commanders may impose a flag on a Soldier, which can have far-reaching consequences. The implementation of a flag restricts any positive personnel actions, including:

  • Promotions
  • Re-enlistment
  • Reassignment
  • Appearances before semi-centralized Department of the Army (DA) boards
  • Eligibility for individual awards and decorations
  • Attendance at military or civilian educational institutions
  • Application for tuition assistance
  • Voluntary resignations or retirements
  • Approval of advance or excess leave
  • Payment of bonuses
  • Activation of Reservists for active-duty tours
  • Assumption of command

17. Are There Examples of Other Consequences of “CID Titling” and Being Indexed in Criminal Records Databases? 

The act of “CID titling” and indexing in databases for criminal records can have a detrimental effect on the future opportunities of ex-military personnel, regardless of their Honorable Discharge status. This can result in challenges such as:

  • Obtaining professional licenses (e.g., admission to the bar, medical practice, daycare operations)
  • Gun ownership and concealed carry licenses
  • Issuance of travel visas and international travel
  • Applications for government assistance
  • Serving as a youth sports coach
  • Becoming foster parents or adopting children
  • College and graduate school admissions

In almost any situation where a background check is required, the individual’s status in criminal records databases can be revealed, potentially leading to the denial of services or opportunities. When titling decisions are indexed in systems like the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII) and appear in background checks, they can be misunderstood. Many people incorrectly assume that being titled equates to guilt. Even when they know titling isn’t a legal determination, the mere existence of a report can create a negative perception, leading to the “cat out of the bag” problem, where the damage to one’s reputation or opportunities is done regardless of innocence.

Addressing the Problems with Titling Removals and Our Advocacy for Reform

At National Security Law Firm, we recognize the deeply flawed nature of the military’s titling and indexing system. One of the key problems is that titling decisions are made based on a very low standard of credible information, which can lead to severe career and reputational consequences for service members and veterans without a corresponding legal finding of guilt. This system unfairly burdens individuals with administrative records that follow them long after the investigation has concluded, regardless of whether charges were dismissed or never filed. These records can appear in background checks, causing missed job opportunities or loss of security clearances, despite no formal conviction.

We advocate for changes to this system, including:

  • Raising the evidentiary standard required for titling decisions to align more closely with legal standards.
  • Ensuring proper notification to individuals when they are titled, so they can promptly address potential consequences.
  • Providing clear, accessible pathways for individuals to appeal or challenge titling decisions, especially in cases where no criminal charges are filed or where procedural errors have occurred.
  • Expanding the opportunity for titling removals in light of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2021, which introduced much-needed reforms but has not yet gone far enough.

Our firm zealously fights for individuals unfairly titled, working to clear their names, remove unjust titling decisions, and protect their futures. We believe that reforms must continue to expand access to titling removals and ensure that these administrative records don’t unjustly hinder service members’ careers.

If you or someone you know has been titled unjustly, contact us for a free consultation. We will assess your case, identify the legal options available, and map out a comprehensive plan to challenge the decision. Our team of former JAG attorneys is here to fight for you every step of the way.

Why Choose the National Security Law Firm for Your Titling Removal Case?

When it comes to navigating the complex and often overwhelming process of titling removal, having the right legal team on your side is critical. The National Security Law Firm (NSLF) is uniquely positioned to handle these cases with unmatched experience, strategic insight, and a fierce dedication to our clients. Here’s why NSLF stands out as the best choice for your titling removal needs:

1. Former Military Prosecutors Who Know the System Inside and Out

Our team is composed of seasoned former military prosecutors who have firsthand experience with the military justice system. We have been on the other side, handling titling cases and advising military commands. This background gives us a significant strategic advantage because we understand how the government approaches titling decisions, what evidence they rely on, and how to exploit weaknesses in the process. This insider knowledge allows us to anticipate government strategies and prepare stronger defenses for our clients.

2. Elite Battle-Hardened Team with a Singular Focus on National Security and Military Law

NSLF is not a general practice law firm; we specialize exclusively in military law and federal employment law. Our attorneys are not civilians who dabble in military cases; they have served in the armed forces, prosecuted and defended cases in military courts, and know the intricacies of the military justice system. This focus ensures that we bring the same level of rigor and commitment to your titling removal case as we would to a complex national security matter. Engaging the military requires a fearless, battle-hardened legal team – and that’s precisely what you get with NSLF.

3. Strategically Located in Washington, D.C.—The Hub of Military Law

Our office is based in Washington, D.C., the center of military and federal law, where critical decisions and hearings take place. Being located in the nation’s capital gives us a strategic advantage, enabling us to maintain strong relationships with military institutions and stay ahead of the latest legal developments. Although we’re located in D.C., we proudly serve clients nationwide, ensuring that no matter where you are, you have access to the trusted legal representation you need.

4. Proven Track Record of Success and Trusted by Our Clients

We’ve earned a 4.9/5 star rating for our outstanding service and successful results in titling removal cases. Our clients trust us because we deliver. Read our Google reviews to see how we’ve helped others just like you. Our attorneys know what arguments persuade military authorities and how to present compelling evidence to achieve favorable results. When you choose NSLF, you’re choosing a team that has built its reputation on trust, excellence, and results.

5. Proven Track Record of Success in Titling Removal Cases

Our experience as former prosecutors doesn’t just give us an understanding of military law; it also provides us with the ability to achieve results. We’ve secured favorable outcomes for clients in some of the most challenging titling removal cases. Our attorneys know what arguments persuade military authorities and how to craft compelling evidence packages to support your removal request. The military’s administrative processes can be daunting, but our proven success in navigating these channels means we know how to maximize your chances of a favorable result.

6. Commitment to Serving Those Who Have Served

As veterans and former military members ourselves, we are deeply committed to serving our fellow service members and veterans. We understand the sacrifices you’ve made and the challenges you face. Our mission is to stand by you, fight for you, and help you navigate the military’s complex legal landscape. When you choose NSLF, you’re not just hiring a law firm – you’re gaining a dedicated team that understands what it means to serve and is ready to fight for your rights.

When it comes to titling removal, you need a legal team that knows how the military works from the inside. The National Security Law Firm is the battle-tested choice for service members seeking justice. 

What You Get When You Retain the National Security Law Firm 

At the National Security Law Firm, we charge a flat fee of $5,000 for titling removal and probable cause removal cases, ensuring that our clients receive top-tier legal representation and support without the stress of unpredictable legal costs. Here’s what you can expect when you choose us:

  • Satisfaction Commitment—But You Probably Won’t Need It. We’re so confident in the quality of our work that we offer unlimited revisions on all submissions until you are completely satisfied. While this satisfaction guarantee is in place for your peace of mind, our thorough preparation and strategic approach mean that in most cases, clients find little or no need for revisions. We aim to get it right the first time, every time.
  • Strategic Advocacy that Maximizes Case Value and Results. At NSLF, we understand that the stakes are high in titling removal cases. A negative title can damage your career, security clearance, and reputation. That’s why we don’t settle for a one-size-fits-all approach; we craft personalized, strategic defenses tailored to each client’s specific situation. Our attorneys meticulously analyze every detail, pursue incremental gains, and utilize all available evidence to strengthen your case. With our team’s combined experience and tactical approach, we aim to achieve results that protect your career and future.
  • Exclusive Attorney Review Board. Our unique Attorney Review Board process is an invaluable feature you won’t find anywhere else. Every week, 3-5 of our experienced attorneys convene to discuss complex cases, analyze strategies, and provide fresh insights. This collaborative approach ensures that your case benefits from multiple perspectives and the collective experience of our legal team.
  • Flexible Monthly Payment Plans. We understand that legal fees can be a barrier for many clients, which is why we offer flexible monthly installment plans through Pay Later by Affirm. Our installment options allow you to pay over 3, 6, 12, or 24 months, making top-notch legal representation accessible. The application process is quick, easy, and does not affect your credit score.
  • Seamless, Electronic Onboarding Process. We make it easy to get started. Our electronic onboarding process allows you to retain our services quickly and efficiently. Once onboarded, our dedicated team of titling removal lawyers will get to work immediately, tracking down and obtaining any necessary records while you focus on more important matters.
  • Dedicated Case Manager for Personalized Attention. Every client is assigned a dedicated case manager who will serve as your point of contact throughout the entire process. Your case manager ensures that you receive personalized, attentive service and that all your questions and concerns are addressed promptly.
  • Priority Handling of Your Case. We understand that time is of the essence in titling removal cases. We prioritize your case to ensure that every step is taken swiftly and effectively, helping you achieve the resolution you need as quickly as possible.
  • Post-Case Support. Our commitment to you doesn’t end when your case is closed. We offer free post-case consultations to assist with any residual legal matters related to your titling removal. We’ll help ensure that your legal concerns are fully resolved.
  • Client-Centered Communication. We prioritize communication with our clients. We guarantee that all client inquiries will receive a response within 24 hours, keeping you informed and reassured throughout the legal process.
  • No Hidden Fees Guarantee
    With NSLF, you never have to worry about unexpected costs. We promise full transparency in our pricing, with no hidden fees, surcharges, or surprise expenses. The flat fee covers everything from start to finish.

When you choose the National Security Law Firm for your titling removal, you’re not just hiring a law firm—you’re partnering with a dedicated team committed to your success. 

Additional Resources

Navigating the complexities of titling removal can be overwhelming, particularly for those unfamiliar with the military justice system. Whether you’ve been unjustly titled or are seeking to correct a record that may impact your future employment or security clearance, understanding your options is crucial. In this section, we provide a list of helpful resources, including statutes, regulations, and step-by-step guides, that can aid you in taking action. These tools, along with the expert guidance of the National Security Law Firm, can help you confidently navigate the appeal process and protect your career.

1. Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5505.07 – Titling and Indexing in Criminal Investigations

  • This document outlines the policies and procedures governing titling decisions and indexing in criminal investigations within the DoD. It explains when a person’s name can be indexed in the Defense Central Index of Investigations (DCII) and under what conditions removal may be sought.

2. National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) – 2021 Updates

  • The 2021 NDAA introduced provisions for service members to appeal titling decisions and request expungement or correction of records in cases where probable cause did not exist. This statute provides more favorable standards for appeals.

3. Defense Clearance and Investigations Index (DCII)

  • This is the federal database where titling decisions are indexed. Learning how the DCII functions and its long-term impact on service members’ records can be crucial for those seeking titling removal.

4. Army CID Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests

  • Individuals can file a FOIA request to obtain their investigation records. Accessing the underlying investigative report is often necessary to build a case for appealing a titling decision.

5. National Archives – Military Records Correction Process

  • The National Archives website provides information on the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) process, which can be another avenue for titling removal appeals.

6. DoD Privacy Program – Expunging Records

  • The DoD Privacy Program offers guidelines on how personal information in military records, including titling decisions, can be corrected or expunged, particularly if there was an error in the titling.
  • Link: DoD Privacy Program

7. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Reports on Military Investigations

  • GAO reports often review the effectiveness and transparency of military investigative procedures, including titling and indexing processes. These reports can provide valuable insights and criticism of existing systems.

Contact Us Today!

With just one quick call, our experienced team at National Security Law Firm will analyze and evaluate your case to see if you are a good candidate for titling removal/expungement and, if so, map out the entire titling removal process for you so you can rest easy knowing everything is being handled by professionals.

The sooner you take action, the sooner you can put this behind you and move forward with your life, free from the limitations of an unjust titling decision. Taking prompt steps to challenge the titling will increase your chances of success and help you avoid the long-term consequences that may impact your career and reputation. Don’t let an unfair titling hold you back—reach out now to start the process and clear your name.

With our affordable flat fee and flexible payment plans, there’s no reason to delay.

Contact us right now for a free consultation—let us fight to protect your career and future before it’s too late.