Why We Do Not Accept Every Global Entry Appeal
One of the most common assumptions people make when contacting a law firm is: if I am willing to hire them, they will take my case. That is not always true.
At National Security Law Firm, we do not accept every matter that contacts us. Sometimes we recommend moving forward. Sometimes we recommend waiting. And sometimes we decline representation altogether.
That may seem unusual — after all, most law firms get paid when they say yes. So why would a firm voluntarily turn away work? The answer is fairly simple: we do not believe every has a realistic path to success. And if we do not believe representation is likely to provide meaningful value, we would rather tell the traveler that upfront.
|
We Do Not Decline Cases Because They Are Difficult
This is probably the biggest misconception about our screening process. Many people assume: if my case is complicated, they will not take it. That is not how we approach these matters.
In fact, many of the cases we accept involve , , , , , , and . Some of these cases are challenging. Some involve uncertainty. Some involve significant risk. Difficulty alone is not the reason we decline representation.
We Frequently Accept Gray-Area Cases
One of the reasons we are comfortable offering our promise is that we spend a great deal of time evaluating cases before we accept them. That does not mean we only accept obvious winners — quite the opposite. Many accepted cases fall into a gray area.
— the incident is concerning, but significant time has passed.
Prior — the facts are not ideal, but strong mitigation exists.
— the violation occurred, but the matter was resolved and there have been no similar incidents since.
— the underlying issue still appears in government records, but the overall picture may be favorable. .
— the issue is not immediately obvious, but there appears to be a realistic path toward understanding and addressing the concern.
These are often the cases where travelers are most uncertain about whether hiring a lawyer makes sense — and they are frequently the cases where our provides the greatest value. Because the outcome may not be obvious, but we still believe a realistic path forward exists.
What We Are Actually Trying to Determine
When evaluating a new matter, we are generally asking four questions:
- Do we understand the issue?
- Are the available facts accurate and complete?
- Is there a realistic path to approval or reinstatement?
- Can we add meaningful value?
If the answer to those questions is yes, we may accept the representation. If the answer is no, we may decline it. That decision has very little to do with whether the case is easy. It has everything to do with whether we believe the appeal has a realistic chance of success and whether legal representation is likely to make a meaningful difference. .
Why We Believe This Approach Is Better
Many travelers contact us after speaking with multiple lawyers. One concern we hear repeatedly is: how do I know the lawyer actually believes in my case? That is a fair question.
Our view is that one of the best ways to demonstrate confidence is being willing to decline matters when we do not believe a realistic path forward exists. Saying “yes” to every case is easy. Saying “no” when we do not believe representation is likely to help is harder. But we believe it creates better outcomes, more realistic expectations, and greater trust. Because if we accept a case, we want the client to know that we genuinely believe there is a path worth pursuing.
|
When We May Decline Representation
Most people expect this section to contain a long list of reasons why we refuse cases. In reality, the list is relatively short.
Remember: we do not decline cases because they are difficult, because they involve uncertainty, or simply because they involve , , , or other challenging facts. Many accepted cases contain those issues.
Instead, we generally decline representation when we reach the conclusion that legal representation is unlikely to provide meaningful value or that approval appears highly unlikely based on the available information.
Category #1: We Believe Approval Is Extremely Unlikely
This is the most common reason we decline a case. Sometimes, after reviewing the facts, we conclude that the chances of are extremely low. That does not mean the traveler is a bad person — it simply means that, based on the information available, we do not see a realistic path forward. If we would not feel comfortable standing behind the case, we generally do not accept it.
Category #2: We Do Not Have Enough Information to Evaluate the Case
Occasionally the problem is not the facts — the problem is that we do not know the facts. In these situations, we may recommend additional investigation before deciding whether representation makes sense. That could include , , , or clarifying important facts. Sometimes a case that appears weak initially becomes much stronger once additional information is obtained.
Category #3: The Client Wants a Strategy We Do Not Believe Will Work
Occasionally a traveler wants to pursue an approach that we do not believe is supported by the facts or likely to be effective — ignoring significant issues, refusing to address the government’s concern, omitting important information, or relying on arguments unsupported by evidence. When that occurs, we explain our concerns and recommend what we believe is the stronger approach. If we fundamentally disagree about how the case should be handled, representation may not be appropriate.
Category #4: We Do Not Believe Legal Representation Will Add Meaningful Value
Sometimes the issue is straightforward, the denial reason is already obvious, the traveler already has the records, or the appeal can likely be handled without significant legal assistance. In those situations, we may conclude that hiring a lawyer is unlikely to provide sufficient value to justify the expense. Our goal is not simply to sign up clients — our goal is to provide meaningful assistance where meaningful assistance is likely to help.
Cases Can Change Over Time
A declined case today is not necessarily a declined case forever. Additional time may pass, new records may become available, may be obtained, additional mitigation may be developed, outstanding issues may be resolved, or more information may be discovered. In some situations, we encourage travelers to contact us again in the future if circumstances change.
Why We Think This Protects Clients
By declining matters that we do not believe are likely to benefit from representation, we help clients avoid spending money unnecessarily, pursuing unrealistic expectations, and investing time in appeals with extremely poor prospects. That approach is not always the easiest business decision — but we believe it is the right one.
Why This Allows Us to Stand Behind Accepted Cases
The screening process and the refund promise are connected. We are willing to offer because we are willing to decline matters when we do not believe a realistic path forward exists. We do not stand behind every case. We stand behind the cases we choose to accept. That philosophy influences every consultation, every case evaluation, and every representation decision we make. And it is one of the reasons many travelers tell us they trusted us enough to move forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do You Only Accept Easy Cases?
No. In fact, many of the matters we accept are not easy. Accepted cases often involve , , , , , , and . Difficulty alone is not what determines whether we accept a case. The more important question is: do we believe there is a realistic path to ?
Does a DUI Automatically Mean You Will Decline the Case?
No. Some of the Global Entry appeals we accept involve . Every case is different. Factors that may matter include how long ago the incident occurred, whether it was isolated, whether additional incidents occurred, the available mitigation, and the overall record. The existence of a DUI alone does not determine whether we will accept or decline a matter.
Does Criminal History Automatically Mean You Will Decline the Case?
No. Many accepted appeals involve . The important question is not simply does criminal history exist? The more important questions are: what happened, how long ago did it occur, what was the outcome, what mitigation exists, and what has happened since? Those factors are often much more important than the mere existence of a criminal record.
Does a Customs Violation Automatically Mean You Will Decline the Case?
No. Many involve customs-related issues. When evaluating these matters, we often consider the nature of the violation, whether it was isolated, whether it was resolved, whether similar incidents occurred afterward, and the overall circumstances. Every case must be evaluated individually.
What If My Case Is Declined?
A declined case is not necessarily a permanent decision. Sometimes additional information becomes available, circumstances change, or mitigation improves. Examples include additional time passing, , newly obtained records, resolution of outstanding issues, and additional mitigation evidence. For that reason, some travelers choose to contact us again later when the facts have changed.
What If You Are Not Sure About My Case?
Many cases fall into a gray area — and that is normal. In those situations, we generally ask: do we believe there is a realistic path forward? We do not require certainty. We do not only accept obvious winners. The question is whether the uncertainty appears manageable and whether legal representation is likely to provide meaningful value.
Do You Need All of My Records Before Deciding?
Not necessarily. In some situations, we can evaluate the case using the information already available. In other situations, additional records may be necessary — , , , or other supporting documentation. The answer depends on the facts of the case.
The Bottom Line
We do not decline cases because they are difficult. We do not decline cases because they involve uncertainty. Many accepted matters involve both. Instead, we generally decline representation when we believe approval is highly unlikely or when we do not believe legal representation is likely to provide meaningful value.
The question is not: is this a perfect case? The question is: is there a realistic path forward? If we believe the answer is yes, we may accept the matter. If we believe the answer is no, we will usually tell you that honestly.
Not Sure Where Your Case Falls?
Every Global Entry denial is different. If you are unsure whether your case is strong, weak, or somewhere in between, we encourage you to schedule a consultation. We can discuss the likely issue, the available records, potential mitigation, whether legal representation is likely to add value, and whether we believe a realistic path forward exists.
Related Resources:
|